Oh AUSTRIA, what are you doing to Elisabeth Sabaditsh Wolff?

Monday, 29 November 2010 17:23 Geoff Dickson Jihad - Dhimmitude-Appeasement-Treason
Print

There can be no doubt that mass immigration of Muslims into European countries is doing irrevocable damage to their living standards, their culture and their freedom. Previously in February 2010 in “Oh SWEDEN” we have written about Sweden and the problems in Malmo, the rape epidemic, the flight of indigenous Swedes and the disgraceful events at the Davis Cup tennis tournament. Recently in October 2010  in “Oh DENMARK” we shared a letter from a Danish woman Susan MacAllen, who lamented about the rising crime statistics, the disproportionate drain on welfare, the rising rape epidemic which is ruining what was once a proud and generous nation. The new EU and its policy of destroying national boundaries and culture is behind this. By accepting the Lisbon Treaty, the EU constitution now overrides the constitution of individual member states, and is destroying democracy, Christianity and free speech, as two brave women in Austria have recently found out.

In this article we will discuss how the new EU courts are stifling free speech and any criticism of Islam or Mohammed, and consider the examples of Susanne Winter and Elisabeth Sadaditsh Wolff.

The RISE and FALL of Europe

Preventing the incursion of Islam into Europe set the stage for enormous economic and cultural growth, whereas mass immigration of Muslims into Europe is today destroying both its economic strength and its culture, and removing freedom of speech as well. The famous battle of Tours in 732AD stopped the advance of Islam into France and the rest of Europe. That military victory by Charles Martel and the subsequent one by the king of Poland, Jan Sobeiski III, in 1683 at the gates of Vienna, saved Europe from the intellectual poverty and unholy backwardness that invariable comes with Islam. Both faced off against superior numbers of Muslims but won the victory. But today the tables are turning as Muslims use our freedoms and Laws and use Stealth Jihad tactics to destroy our miserable house from within.

2009 Susanne Winter

First let us consider the case of Austrian politician Susanne Winter who was quoted as saying in 2008:

“In today’s system” the Prophet Muhammad would be considered a “child molester,” apparently referring to his marriage to a six-year-old child. She also said that it is time for Islam to be “thrown back where it came from, behind the Mediterranean.”

And reported 22nd January 2009:

Vienna - Austrian far-right parliamentarian Susanne Winter was convicted Thursday of incitement because of her anti-Muslim statements, including the claim that Islam's prophet Mohammed was a paedophile. A court in Winter's home town of Graz also found the 51-year-old politician guilty of humiliating a religion. She was sentenced to a fine of 24,000 euros (31,000 dollars) euros and a suspended prison term of three months, Austrian news agency APA reported. The politician, who took a seat in parliament last fall for the Freedom Party (FPOe), made the anti-Islamic remarks in January 2008.

She also proposed in a discussion with students that Muslim men should commit bestiality rather than making "indecent advances" on girls. (source)

So an Austrian politician correctly calls Mohammed a paedophile and is charged with humiliating Islam. If fact, by his life according to the Hadith, Mohammed was a war lord who stole from others, and was a murdering, raping, Jew hating, white supremist, slave trading paedophile who cross dressed in Aisha’s clothes.

Mohammed could possibly be the worst example of humankind that ever lived, yet millions of Muslim parents call their infant sons by this name. Islam is indeed the Powerful Delusion!

And from Italy, political leader Daniela Santanche also calls Mohammed a paedophile.

Note the rage and distress of the poor “insulted” Muslims in the audience.

2010 Elisabeth Sabaditsh Wolff

Now we fast forward to 2010 and consider the unfolding drama of Elisabeth Sabaditsh Wolff who has had the temerity to be truthful about Islam. Please watch this earlier video in which Elisabeth explains the background to her case. By giving a public lecture in November 2009 for the Austrian Freedom Party which was secretly recorded by a rogue reporter from the News magazine, she now finds herself accused of hate speech against Islam. The first hearing in Elisabeth’s case will take place in the court of Vienna on November 23rd.

An extract from her recent speech given in Denmark:

I stand here before you in the city of Copenhagen in the year 2010. This is widely considered to be an enlightened country in the heart of an enlightened continent.

Our basic freedoms have long been guaranteed — first by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as passed by the United Nations in 1948, and then buttressed by the Council of Europe in 1950 through the European Convention of Human Rights, which was later affirmed by the European Union. Our individual countries have additionally codified the same basic rights in their own constitutions.

These rights include the freedom of individual conscience, the right to assemble peaceably, and the right to practice our religion freely, or to have no religion at all. And, perhaps most importantly of all, they include the right to voice our opinions freely and to publish them without hindrance.

Yet freedom of speech is under attack today here in Denmark, as it is in my own country Austria, and indeed all across Europe. Today, in 21st century Western Europe, our right to free speech is being shut down quietly and systematically with an effectiveness that the commissars in the old Soviet Union could only dream of.

A milestone in this ominous totalitarian trend will be reached tomorrow, 28 November 2010, when the member states of the European Union are required to implement an innocuous-sounding legal provision known as the “Framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia”, or, more fully, the “Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law.” According to the final article of the Framework Decision, “Member States shall take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision by 28 November 2010.”

Why does this matter to the cause of free speech in Europe?

If you read the full text of the Framework Decision (which may be found in the legislative section of the EU’s website), you will learn that “Each Member State shall take the measures necessary… to ensure that the following intentional conduct is punishable.” Such “intentional conduct” includes “conduct which is a pretext for directing acts against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin.”

Based on what has recently happened to Geert Wilders and me — and earlier to Gregorius Nekschot, Jussi Halla-aho, and numerous others — we can all guess who will be punished under this provision of the Framework Decision: those who criticize Islam.

Even worse, a complaint made by a member state does not have to be “dependent on a report or an accusation made by a victim of the conduct”, nor does the alleged offender have to be “physically present in its territory”.

As most of you already know, nearly a year ago I was made aware that “hate speech” charges might be filed against me — I had “denigrated religious teachings” by giving one of my public lectures on Islam.

The possibility of my prosecution was not communicated to me directly, but through articles in the press.
It was not until last month that a court date was set for my case. Once again, I had to discover this fact in the press — in NEWS, the same left-wing newspaper that brought the original complaint against me. I was not officially notified of my hearing date until several days later.

The evidence used against me this past week was a transcript of a tape of my lecture, provided to the court by the same socialist newspaper. It included words that were not spoken by me, and words that were not spoken in public, which therefore were not a violation of the law.

The full speech is given in the References below.

Please also read the court proceedings in the References below.

Will the EU court throw Elisabeth Sabaditsh Wolff to the wolves?

CONCLUSION

The full impact of the Lisbon Treaty on Europe is now starting to show. The Constitution of the EU overrides the Constitution of member states and gradually all the freedoms hard won over hundreds of years will disappear. How many people understand that paedophilia is not a criminal offense in the new EU Constitution? How long is it before Islam is declared as the religion of State for the EU? Austrian MP Susan Winter was convicted for calling Mohammed a paedophile in 2008 and now Elisabeth Sabaditsh Wolff is about to experience EU justice.

Why doesn’t the Austrian government protect the basic freedom of speech of its citizens?

What can one say but just “Oh Austria”.


REFERENCES

Elisabeth Sabadetsh Wolff speech at Copenhagen

Elisabeth Sabadetsh Wolff court proceedings

Susanne Winter convicted of hate crimes

Previous Articles in the “Oh EUROPE” Series:

Oh DENMARK

Oh SWEDEN