The Game Of Inches

Monday, 06 December 2010 18:42 Lilith & Blue Heeler Jihad - Infiltration
Print

The old expression “give them an inch and they’ll take a mile” is the stark reality Australia must come to terms with, as it slowly wakens from its slumber to confront the islamic menace. Muslims in Australia are running a near-perfect textbook islamisation campaign. It is not “as though it were straight from a Muslim Brotherhood manual for take-over of western nations” - their campaign IS straight from just such a manual.

Just to bring people either up to speed or to refresh memories, recall this document which is now available world-wide.
To quote the website which hosts the document - LINK

The Al Qaeda Manual

The attached manual was located by the Manchester (England) Metropolitan Police during a search of an al Qaeda member’s home. The manual was found in a computer file described as “the military series” related to the “Declaration of Jihad.” The manual was translated into English and was introduced earlier this year at the embassy bombing trial in New York.

And here is only one brief encapsulation of its dire content:

“To those champions who avowed the truth day and night......And wrote with their blood and sufferings these phrases...

The confrontation that we are calling for with the apostate regimes does not know Socratic debates, Platonic ideals, nor Aristotelian diplomacy. But it knows the dialogue of bullets, the ideals of assassination, bombing, and destruction, and the diplomacy of the cannon and machine-gun.

• Islamic governments have never and will never be established through peaceful solutions and cooperative councils. They are established as they [always] have been

• by pen and gun

• by word and bullet

• by tongue and teeth “

Please, dear readers, take special note of bullet point 2!

I urge people to read the entire document; it is illuminating in a way that no amount of “western” writing on islam can ever hope to be.

Really, in what was is this unclear? Is there something subliminal in the text we have missed? How can it possibly be misconstrued?

The only question of ANY relevance - and deserving of THE MOST VIGOROUS action by our government and security forces- is this: are there any adherents of this creed living in Australia? Is this creed being advanced by anyone in our nation?

The answer is, of course, a resounding YES. Look no further than Hizb Ut-Tahrir.

Regular readers, and all others who follow the islamisation issue closely, are more than aware that Hizb Ut-Tahrir is only the most visible of these traitors in Australia. It’s alarming to note, they are not alone.

This places the severest obligation on our leaders – act appropriately and accordingly. It also becomes a matter of direst personal concern to ask – is the government reacting appropriately? What say you, Australia?

But that is not the point! These people are highly visible, known and, we hope, stringently observed and controlled. What they do is (within reasonable bounds) a known reality. They make no secret of their intentions. It’s those we do not know that present the greatest danger to Australia.

Forgive me for verging into language that could be called hysterical but I maintain that our gravest danger does not come from the likes of Hizb Ut-Tahrir but from within our own elite “ruling class”.

We at AIM have long contended that our government is complicit in assisting this islamisation process. It REALLY is moot, whether this is through ignorance, a result of being duped by the spin of professional islamic propagandists, or varying measures of duplicity, avarice or ….. treachery. The only thing of any importance to us, as a people and a nation, is that it is happening.


By pen; by word; by tongue.

An article by Melbourne Q.C Peter Faris, “Charter opens door to Sharia law recognition”, discusses a recent legal situation in Oklahoma, U.S.A, where legislators managed to thwart attempts to make that state consider and/or use international laws, as well as Sharia, or Islamic law in its internal legislature.

The news seems hopeful for Oklahoma but far less so for us, as Faris notes,

“In Victoria, the Charter of Human Rights actually permits the use of international laws and judgments in applying the charter. Section 14 of that charter provides for freedom of religion. The issue then arises; does this mean that Muslims are entitled to have Shariah law applied to them in the Victorian courts?”

Faris points to the ominous truth we must confront. 

“Obviously, Islam is a religion. Less obvious, but more important is that, unlike Christianity, Islam is a complete religion governing every aspect of the believer's life, including law.
Shariah law is actually an integral part of the Islamic religious belief and, under the charter, must be protected and applied. Section 32(2) of the charter throws more light on the issue.
That subsection states: "International law and the judgments of domestic, foreign and international courts and tribunals relevant to a human right may be considered in interpreting a statutory provision."
It is important to understand that there are "courts and tribunals" applying Shariah law to the 1.6 billion Muslims in the Muslim world.
In addition to that, the Islamic world has its own Human Rights Covenants -- the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam, 1990, which is intended to "serve as a general guidance for member states in the field of human rights".

In the Cairo Declaration, it is made clear that all human rights derive from the Koran.
For example: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Shariah" (Article 19(d)); "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this declaration are subject to the Islamic Shariah" (Article 24); and "The Islamic Shariah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration" (Article 25).
These human rights must be fully respected. Australian Muslims deserve no less.
Decisions on Islamic human rights must be relevant in deciding whether Shariah law is applicable in Victoria.

Quite obviously, those Islamic decisions powerfully state that Shariah law must be applied. The Victorian courts must consider these decisions under the charter, thus it makes it very likely that, at some stage in the future, Shariah law will be applied.
Further, there is precedent in Victoria through courts that are for the exclusive use of a minority group, in this instance Aborigines (known in Victoria as Kooris).
As a matter of principle, there is no difference between special courts that are racially defined (Koori courts) to those which are religiously defined (Shariah courts).
In fact, the Muslims have a much stronger case because their devoutly held beliefs actually include a legal system (Shariah).
It is this sort of process that the Oklahoma citizens voted against. In Victoria it is too late.” (source)


The author makes reference to Aboriginal law and the existing “Koori Court” system.

However ……

“Aboriginal courts, as they currently exist, operate within the boundaries of the Australian legal system and in no case does an Aboriginal Elder have authority in the Australian legal system to decide a case, or impose punishment. The role of Elders is primarily to advise the court.

In some courts Elders also speak to the accused (about the consequences of their behaviour) in a culturally appropriate manner. It is important to note that
Aboriginal courts are not Indigenous-controlled ‘community courts’ vested with western judicial power”

Aboriginal courts provide an environment which is more sensitive to Aboriginal
customary law and other cultural matters and can, therefore, more easily and effectively take those matters into account. Importantly, by recognising the
central role of Aboriginal Elders, these courts may also benefit Aboriginal communities by reinvigorating Aboriginal customary law and cultural values where
those structures may have broken dow
n.” (source)

A point to remember is that the Australian Aborigine is the traditional owner of the land and therefore, has every right to be able to control their own traditional laws.

The same applies to Jewish traditional law, as controlled by the Beth Din, (Jewish traditional court), that in basis is on a par with Aboriginal law, in that it governs small matters, Jewish religious matters and petty arguments, although the outcome is not enforceable by law.

Despite their astonishing claims on this nation, Muslims patently ARE NOT indigenous and have no such pre-existing condition to support the introduction of their preferred legal system.

Sharia law cannot be permitted to gain a foothold in this country. Sharia law is in direct conflict with those ideals we hold dear, in our Judaeo-Christian beliefs and ethics.

How can we allow a system of law that is diametrically opposite to our own, to run as a parallel system?

Simply……..we can’t. Not if we are to remain a sovereign nation of self-determination.

We must oppose any enshrining of Sharia, in any form or shade, and demand nothing less than the strictest attention from our politicians and legislators.

All Australian politicians, State and Federal, need to be made aware of statements such as the following, which do not come from xenophobic, intolerant, islamophobic bigots, but from the mouths of Muslims themselves.

  1. The purpose of Shariah is submission. Shariah seeks to establish that Allah is the divine lawgiver and that no other law may properly exist but Allah’s law.
  2. Shariah seeks to achieve this goal through persuasion and other non- violent means. But when necessary and under certain prescribed circumstances the use of force and even full-scale war to achieve the dominance of Shariah worldwide is not only permissible, but obligatory. The use of force or war is termed Jihad.
  3. The goal of Shariah is to achieve submission to Allah’s law by converting or conquering the entire world and the methodology to achieve this end (by persuasion, by force and subjugation, or by murder) is extant doctrine and valid law by virtue of a universal consensus among the authoritative Shariah scholars throughout Islamic history.
  4. The doctrine of Jihad is foundational because it is based upon explicit verses in the Qur’an and the most authentic of canonical Sunna and it is considered a cornerstone of justice: until the infidels and polytheists are converted, subjugated, or murdered, their mischief and domination will continue to harm the Muslim nation.
  5. Jihad is conducted primarily through kinetic warfare but it includes other modalities such as propaganda and psychological warfare.