Australian Islamist Monitor

Islam Under Scrutiny

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Port Phillip Council – master dhimmis and moral inversions.

E-mail Print PDF

As an AIM reader, I thought you would be interested as you already have some articles on this.   On the 21st of March, the council held an open meeting to discuss the increase in the number of people who could be crammed into the small Alma Road Community House (St Kilda, Victoria) from around 40 to 100.

Given the house is supposed to be used for small, casual gatherings of locals one might wonder why the need for such an increase.  The house is also used for Muslim worship, for the important Friday prayers where all Muslim males are required to attend.  Dare to bring up any concerns over this use and you were labelled as racist by councillors and also intimidated by threats that such discussion contravened the Religious Vilification Act.

Planning takes place in a social context but council didn’t want to hear the legitimate concerns of people particularly with regard to allowing and increasing Muslim worship in a ratepayer funded public facility.  Free speech was gagged while council patted themselves on the back for their PC tolerance and claimed anti-racism. 

Racism:   This was almost funny if it wasn’t so tragic.   Any who mentioned anything to do with Islam were told they were racist and made to stop. 

Apparently the councillors don’t know what race actually is  --- a group of persons connected by common descent or hereditary  (often with identifying characteristics).    Since Islam is an ideology, a political and religious ‘belief’ system followed by people of several ‘races’ and ethnic backgrounds, Islam is clearly NOT a race.

Hence telling the truth about Islam is NOT racism.   Nazism is also a belief system for its followers, is commenting on Nazism racism?

In reality, ISLAM is an extremely RACIST ideology.  

The council endlessly told us how they wouldn’t support racism yet they endorsed the use of a ratepayer funded Community House by the members of the racist ideology of Islam. One could be forgiven for thinking the council was in fact racist and its claims otherwise were nothing more than a gag motion to stop the truth about Islam being revealed.

If the council was truly against racism then it would forbid the use of its facilities to Muslims.

Instead it facilitates and funds such use.

Religious vilification Act:  again any who started to talk about Islam’s text or practices were subjected to the suggestion that submissions and indeed comments contravened this act.  This was ‘legal action’ intimidation of any who rightly expressed concerns over the current use of the facility by Muslims with concern growing as numbers were increased to 100!

Again this shows the gross hypocrisy of the council protecting Islam which contains an immense amount of vilification and outright lies about the religions of others and offers death or conversion to many and death or submission under Islam with the imposition of repressive laws and taxes for others.  Their al-fatihah prayer chanted 17 times a day vilifies and threatens others.

How can accurately stating Islam's text, practices and laws be vilification when Islam's supposed to be so wonderful?    Why can Muslims teach their frightening text but it's vilification if we state it (and we are 'vilified' and called racists!)?   Can you vilify something that actually IS vile?

These 2 points alone indicate what Melanie Phillips refers to as a ‘moral inversion.’    The council protected Islam which has more racist supremacy (white Arab Muslim male vs Aryan ) and more religious and racial hatred than the Nazis (Islam hates all non-Muslims –atheists, pagans, idolators eg Buddhists, polytheists eg Hindus, Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians, Bahai, Sikhs, Mandaeans, Ancestor Worshippers, tribal beliefs, ....  and black people, Turks, people with flat faces and small eyes vs Jews and gypsies).

The council showed no concern at all about the social impact of its planning, indeed it tried to limit any discussion of such impact --- 100+ Muslim males chanting 'allahu akbar,' don’t be racist!

Ignore the fact that some residents have fled Islamic violence and the chant of allahu akbar, particularly following Friday prayers will indeed be terrifying to hear emanating from the Community House where all should be safe and welcome.  Of course apostates are also keen to hear this given Islam promises them death.  And Jews, well outside B’nai B’rith my bet is Jews won’t be happy either particularly after the horrendous stabbing death of a family of Jews resting on their Sabbath.   Both parents and 3 children, one a 3 month old baby were stabbed to death by Fatah in the west bank. (Schlussel, Debbie.  UPDATED w/VIDEO: Photos of Itamar Jewish Kids Massacred by Palestinians)

But why would this cause a problem, don’t we all love diversity, multiculturalism and religious freedom.   Islam demands the death of others so the Muslims were simply following their religion.

 Diversity anyone?

We heard endless prattle about how we should love and desire ‘diversity,’ ‘multiculturalism’ and ‘religious freedom’ from those supporting the changes ... but no-one was allowed to discuss the fact that Islam’s religious freedom is a threat to non-Muslims and a threat to all females; no-one could state that Islam is NOT multicultural or pro-diversity as any look at the Muslim majority areas of the world immediately shows.  Others are persecuted by Islam and in some areas others are banned.

We heard statements about kids parties and people who weren't worried about parking.  Indeed parking seemed to be the main thing on the planning agenda and it is NOT adequate but go ahead anyway!  Who cares about the amenity of others!

There is a wider context to this planning decision and its ramifications are many.  Muslims now think they have the right to force Islam into the public space, to occupy Community Houses and have others pay for their worship.   We all know the ‘place of assembly’ is really a place of Islamic worship.

This IS discrimination in favour of Islam.

Liberty Australia also had its role in promoting an ideology where liberty is an obscene idea.  Some pompous male told us that to deny the Muslims would breach Victoria’s human rights laws or something like that!  Well the ‘laws’ may allow freedom of religion but they certainly don’t demand religious groups be allowed to worship in public property paid for by ratepayers! 

There are 4 nearby mosques in Windsor, Prahan, Hawthorn and Caulfield all near public transport, open to others, open for the 5 prayers and one even has separate male and female prayer rooms.   Use these!

As one objector noted, why don’t they pay for their own facilities!   Here, here!  PC pro-Islamic discrimination at work!

Every other ‘religious’ group out there from crystal worshippers, wiccans to the more conventional should also demand council give them the use of public facilities like Community Houses where the ratepayers pick up the cost of the building, maintenance, utilities etc. Why should Muslims be privileged in this way!

Council tried the line – they only use it for one hour on Friday.  This beggars belief as the compulsory purification which includes acts that should NOT be allowed in a public facility (eg ‘purification’ requires removal of filth which can involve washing the penis and anus, and wudu – general washing of many areas of the body including face, head, ears, hairline, arms, feet, ankles and rinsing water through the mouth several times and spitting it out and sucking water through the nose several times and blowing it out. Dirty water splashes everywhere.) (see The Basics of the Muslim’s Prayer ) 

This takes around 20 minutes and the current house certainly can’t accommodate this washing ritual for a small number, let alone 100+ so this will take much longer for a big group.  Then there’s the prayer session and Friday prayers also includes teaching of their very threatening religious text.   This is not casual use but permanent exclusive use as no-one else could fit in with this number and many would not want to.

Not only have council increased the number allowed but they have also increased the hours of use and added ‘for religious purposes’ to their list of acceptable uses.  Hmm, why would that be?

This is a planning issue because such changes allow ‘religious’ practices which risk the health and safety of others as dirty water with fungi, bacteria, viruses and probably body fluids is walked through this tiny house as 50 people would fill the house and 100 would stuff it.  Others may slip on the wet surfaces and the infective material can last for a long time.   Council declared such discussion ‘racist’ and demanded it stop.  Are Muslim needs more important than the health and safety of others affected by these planning decisions?

Will we find Islamic use increasing as Islam takes over bit by bit?   Will ratepayers foot the bill for their special washing facilities which will certainly be needed for 100 Muslims?  How far will council go in its support of this racist, vilifying, threatening ideology?

The house has few rooms and one is a locked computer room that only holds 10.   A local said he counted 54 Muslims in the house – a house which really holds 40 and this was before the increase to 100.

Many speakers against raised very good points but these fell on completely deaf ears.  Some points included the secular nature of our society and the need for council to be secular rather than fund any religion; others were concerned about public security as council, according to locals, does not keep a proper check on the house including checks on numbers and who is entering. 

Council recklessly said it had no problem with people from outside the area entering the Community House.   What will they do if Muslim numbers exceed 100?

Given that the house is listed as a mosque on a dubious Islamic website, one might have hoped that council would show some concern! 

Council quickly went to a vote and surprise, surprise, it was unanimous agreement with the changes to facilitate whom one wonders.   The process was quite a farce.  Are council really completely ignorant of the deadly nature of Islam?  Do they really not know the difference between race and ideology?   These people were indeed master dhimmis.

At the end some people actually congratulated the 2 Muslims present and they deserve congratulation for they must be wetting themselves over the gullibility of the council and the fact that a Jewish group (anti-defamation league), Liberty Australia and others who live in some false world where all is lolly pops, did the work for them.

And of course the most racist, vilifying, deadly  ‘religion’ the world has ever seen is completely protected by council and those who try to expose the truth about Islam and express very real concerns based on knowledge and experience are labelled racists and threatened.   It is a moral inversion indeed.


 I am just an observer,  NOT a member of Q Society

Last Updated on Thursday, 24 March 2011 04:01  

AIM Listed by NLA

pandora

Australian Islamist Monitor's web publications were selected for preservation by the National Library of Australia. Access to our materials stored in the NLA Archive is facilitated in two ways: via the Library’s online catalogue; and via subject and title lists maintained on the PANDORA home page.
Click HERE for direct access to the archive

Islam Kills

History - Articles

Lest We Forget the Battle of Tours

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Australians celebrate and revere Anzac Day on April 25th each year in remembrance of our brave soldiers who fought in two great world wars to secure our freedom. Every Australian identifies with the slogan “lest we forget” and in services held around the country people reflect on the battles and men who died to secure our freedom. Yet across the world in France, there is one remarkable battle which helped form the Europe we know today and allowed the development of civilization based on Judeo Christian principles. This one famous battle has become known as the battle of Tours and effectively stopped the Muslim advance into Europe. After the death of Mohammed in 632AD, Muslim armies exploded out of the Arabian peninsula to conquer much of the Middle East, expanding across north Africa. From there they crossed into Spain in 711AD and eventually controlled much of al-Andalus by 715AD. It was the victory at Tours by Charles Martel that stemmed the tide and eventually the Muslim marauders were expelled from Spain in 1492 when the last outpost at Granada fell to King Ferdinand of Spain. 

Read more

Shivaji’s Coronation Laudatory Landmark

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Infidels' Resistance

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was born, lived, fought and won battles against religious and social oppression in the 17th century Bharat or India. He was a shining star in the Indian firmament and is renowned as a champion of the downtrodden and depressed masses. He was and continues to be an icon for the classes and masses alike and is seen as a rallying point for peasants oppressed by foreign rulers, Pathans and Moghuls alike. Sexually exploited women found in Shivaji Raje a protector, a benefactor and flocked to his Hindavi Swaraj to find solace and feel liberated under his saffron flag. 

Read more


Ransomer of Captives from the Muslims

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Perhaps some readers might be interested to know that January 28 is considered a feast day among Catholics – actually 2 feast days are celebrated on the same day – one is of ST Thomas Aquinas, the great medieval theologian and philosopher who adapted Aristotle to the western Judeo-Christian worldview. . It is also the feast day of a lesser known person – St Peter Nolasco, the great ransomer of captives from the Muslims.

Read more


Islamic Pirates

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Barbary Corsair
Somalian Islamic Pirates & Lessons from History
 
The dramatic rescue of the American cargo-ship captain Richard Phillips from the hands of Somalian Islamic pirates by the U.S. Navy—killing three pirates, holding him hostage at gun-point, through precision-targeting—warrants a review of the U.S. struggle with piracy and hostage-taking in North Africa, which ended two centuries ago.

Raiding trade-caravans and hostage-taking for extracting ransom in Islam was started by Prophet Muhammad. Having become powerful and secure after his relocation to Medina from Mecca in 622, Muhammad initiated Jihad or holy war in the form of raids of trade-caravans for earning livelihood for his community. In the first successful raid of a Meccan caravan at Nakhla in December 623, his brigands killed one of the attendants, took two of them captive, and acquired the caravan as “sacred” booty. The captives were ransomed to generate further revenue. Muhammad, later on, expanded this mode of Jihad to raiding non-Muslim communities around Arabia—for capturing their homes, properties and livestock, capturing their women and children as slaves often for ransoming and selling, and imposing extortional taxes—which sometimes involved mass-slaughter of the attacked victims.

Read more


The Battle of Broken Hill

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

Battle of Broken Hill Logo
 
The First Islamic Terrorist Attack on Australian Soil
 
On January 1, 1915 two Broken Hill men, both former camel drivers, armed themselves with rifles, an homemade flag bearing Islamic insignia and a large supply of ammunition and launched a surprise attack on the Picnic Train about 3 kilometres outside Broken Hill.

The train carried about 1200 Broken Hill residents to Silverton where a picnic to celebrate the new year was to take place.

The two Muslim men, Gool Mohamed originally a Pashtun tribesman from Afghanistan and Mullah Abdullah from what is known today as Pakistan, decided to wage jihad against Australian infidels after Australia and the Ottoman Empire officially joined the opposite sides in the WWI.

Read more


Jihad Galore

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Jihad Galore and the Toledo Whore

Battle of Higueruela

Alhambra - GazelleHow often in conversation with a Muslim, do they quote Spain as the crowning achievement of Islam, where Muslims, Jews and Christians lived in harmony for about 800 years?

And when you mention the killings and massacres, you are told that the Spanish Inquisition was much worse.
This is a misconception, since the Inquisition in Spain was responsible for only between 4,000 and 5,000 lives. [1]

Yet in 1066AD, in a single day, muslims murdered over 4,000 Jews because Vizier Joseph ibn Naghrela had risen to a position greater than them, and of course, this upset the Muslim sensitivities. [2]

Read more


Arabs Hated The Quran

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

 
How the Arabs Hated The Quran
 
Old Quran

Wh y are you a Muslim?
Musli ms in general love to hear the above question because it has a simple and readymade answer in their minds besides it gives them the opp or t u nity to propagate their religion and talk proudly about Islam.

 

Read more


Lepanto Anniversary

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Decisive Victory for the West

At this time of year, it is timely to remember one of the greatest victories of the west against the Islamic world. On the 7th October in 1571, Don Juan and the Holy League, led by Admiral Doria, defeated the larger Ottoman fleet in the Battle of Lepanto, saving Europe from the Turks and militant Islam. The Holy League was a coalition of different armies - of the Republic of Venice, the Papacy (under Pope Pius V), Spain (including Naples, Sicily and Sardinia), the Republic of Genoa, the Duchy of Savoy, the Knights Hospitaller and some others.

Read more


Muslim Jerusalem

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

Jerusalem - Coat of ArmsWhy do Muslims insist that Jerusalem is their Holy City?
When Mohamed and his faithful followers moved from Mecca to Medina, they found themselves among three Jewish tribes/clans (BANU-L-NADIR, BANU KAINUKA and BANU KURAIZA)  which settled there some time after their expulsion from their homeland and also living there were  two Arab, pagan tribes.

Mohammed, who at this stage needed more followers, decided to win those tribes over and convert them to his newly invented religion.

Islam was yet not as fully developed as we know it today, and Mohammed was still having his sessions with Allah (the Medina period revelations).

Read more


Killing of Banu Quraiza

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Did Prophet Muhammad order Killing Surrendered Jews of Banu Quraiza and Khaybar?  A historical Analysis

In the post 9/11 era of this modern-world, Islamists around the globe are busy with ‘damage control utopia’ in order to correct the image of religion Islam. We all know that the nucleus of Islam are: Quran, Hadiths (Sunnah) supported by Islamic histories and biographies recorded by various famous Islamic scholars and historians.

What Mecca?

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Early History

A great tragedy of the Islamic control of our universities and political correctness plus the fear of extreme violence if anyone dares question the roots and claims of Islam is ...that nobody dares question the roots and claims of Islam!!!  I want to stimulate interest and offer this summary of information on Mecca from (LINK) which discusses some problems with Muslim claims in a comparison of evidence supporting Islam/Christianity. 

Read more


Yahweh or Hubal

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

FlagThere is a very strongly entrenched view among majority of Westerners today that the three main monotheistic religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam share one common God and therefore despite the obvious differences, the core foundation of these three religions is the same. 

Read more