Australian Islamist Monitor

Islam Under Scrutiny

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

My debate with Bangladeshi Mullah Scientist who considers Islam brought all the women’s rights on Earth!

E-mail Print PDF

(This debate happened recently in the e-journal ‘News From Bangladesh’ between me and Dr. Sultan Ahmad the so called Dean of the faculty of science in the University of Chittagong, Bangladesh, on the subject of women’s rights in Islam. My questions to him can be found HERE )

Dr. Sultan Ahmad has not responded to my questions to the point at all, and he was simply beating around the bush leaving my questions unaddressed. Like most fanatical Islamists (who usually will claim some untrue goodies in Islam to fool the readers) who do not have any clue to defend their non-existent claims/lies about Islam always jump on his critic and start personal attacks instead of answering the questions asked by the critic. Dr. Ahmad is not an exception and I am not surprised at all. When these Islamists hypocritically lie profusely about Islamic goodies but can not defend them when challenged, only thing they do is attack the critic personally with incoherent and ludicrous arguments. His tirades have been targeted on my person leaving my all queries totally unanswered. Hence, I will not respond to his unnecessary personal attacks which deserve no response from me because, I don’t need to stoop down so low like Dr. Ahmad. Readers can read his jargonized tirades HERE

However, I will respond to some selective issues in which Dr. Ahmad has deliberately lied big-time. He also blamed me for the crime I never committed. Below is my response with all the pertinent references to substantiate my claims about Islam.

Dr. Ahmad said:

“Reply: I have given partial answer above. No country in the present world is run by Islamic laws; moreover Islamic laws are always pure. No country in the World is practicing Islamic law. You were lying about the countries mentioned above. Yes, to Ex-Muslims bigots, worldly laws are the best.”

This is really very funny! If this is the case that after 1400 years, Islamic Allah could not have established just one “Islamic state” on the planet of Earth then why you are even talking about any so called Islamic rights of women? Where could you show any sample of your hypothetical claims on earth? Are you not ashamed that after 1400 years you can not show just one country of your imaginary Islamic paradise?

Readers can learn that Saudi Arabia (SA) the cradle of Islam is the 100% pure Islamic Sharia based Islamic nation on earth. SA is the glaring example of a true Sharia based Islamic paradise on the modern Earth. The holy constitution of SA is the testament of my claim. The constitution of SA is the holy Quran and Sunnah. Below are some “Articles” from SA’s constitution which will prove 100% that SA is of course the most pure Islamic state governed by the Sharia laws (made of Quran and Sunnah).

Saudi Arabia – Constitution:

Chapter 1 General Principles

Article 1
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is a sovereign Arab Islamic state with Islam as its religion; God's Book and the Sunnah of His Prophet, God's prayers and peace be upon him, are its constitution, Arabic is its language and Riyadh is its capital. 

Article 7
Government in Saudi Arabia derives power from the Holy Koran and the Prophet's tradition.

Article 6
Citizens are to pay allegiance to the King in accordance with the holy Koran and the tradition of the Prophet, in submission and obedience, in times of ease and difficulty, fortune and adversity. 

Article 8 [Government Principles]
Government in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is based on the premise of justice, consultation, and equality in accordance with the Islamic Shari'ah.

Article 17
Property, capital, and labor are essential elements in the Kingdom's economic and social being. They are personal rights which perform a social function in accordance with Islamic Shari'ah.

Article 23 [Islam]
The state protects Islam; it implements its Shari'ah; it orders people to do right and shun evil; it fulfills the duty regarding God's call.

Article 26 [Human Rights]
The state protects human rights in accordance with the Islamic Shari'ah.

Article 45
The source of the deliverance of fatwa in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are God's Book and the Sunnah of His Messenger. The law will define the composition of the senior ulema body, the administration of scientific research, deliverance of fatwa and it's (the body of senior ulema's) functions.

Article 46
The judiciary is an independent authority. There is no control over judges in the dispensation of their judgements except in the case of the Islamic Shari'ah.

Article 48
The courts will apply the rules of the Islamic Shari'ah in the cases that are brought before them, in accordance with what is indicated in the Book and the Sunnah, and statutes decreed by the Ruler which do not contradict the Book or the Sunnah.

Readers can read the entire Saudi Arabia’s constitution by clicking HERE.

Dr. Ahmad for heaven sake please tell us what do you read in the above articles of SA’s constitution? Are not these “Articles” sound to you the testaments of a pure Islamic paradise? Or, give us your references which will support that SA is not an Islamic state! Bring them up! Who you think is the liar here? Oh yes, like most hypocritical Islamists you will say now: “look, SA is headed by a King, and Islam does not allow Kingship blah blah blah!!!” So, what was the Caliphate and Khalifa meant to you? Islamic Caliphate was pure despotic, totalitarian, dictatorial rulers as the God’s vicegerent having supreme authority which nobody but God has any power to question. Caliphate had even more power than today’s Saudi King. Modern day’s king is much better than those utterly despotic Caliphs of ancient Arabia. Do you think anybody could give a second opinion to the rules of Prophet, or to those four rightly guided Caliphs? Are you kidding? Just read the “Article 5” of Saudi Constitution: King will follow Sharia and keep upright among them is to receive allegiance in accordance with the principles of the Holy Koran and the Tradition of the Venerable Prophet. Dose this “Article” tells how the Kings should rule the country?

For reader’s information, in addition to SA, also Iran, Talibani Afghanistan, Sudan, Somalia, Nigeria (Northern half), are all pure Sharia (despotic rules of draconian laws) based Islamic countries ruled by some Islamic dictators in the fashion of ancient barbaric justice system called Islamic Sharia. All these Islamic Sharia-based paradises practice draconian Sharia laws: chopping hands and feet, beheading, floggings, stoning deaths, honor killings, etc, which they call Allah’s justice. Iran, Pakistan, Talibani Afghanistan, Sudan and Somaila—they all practice Islamic RAZOM (read Stoning death) even in this 21st century. Readers can listen this CNN video news (URL) about floggings of a woman who was gang-rapped because she could not produce 4 male witnesses to prove the case of rape. Saudi woman gets 200 lashes. Please watch these videos:

Also here:

Very recently in Sudan one young woman was brutally flogged publicly by Islamic draconian Sharia justice. Please watch this barbaric Islamic justice in this video:

 Warning - Very graphic

In some Middle-eastern and African Islamic nations slavery and sex with slaves girls are practiced even today. Of course, slave girls are called “house-maids” this days. One can find constitution of those Islamic nations by seeking help from the almighty and omniscient GOOGLE search in the internet discovered by the American kaffirs.

Dr. Ahmad said:

“If you are not blind, then look at Muslim countries where women are becoming not only political leaders – they are becoming President, Prime Minister, and Ministers. The country in which you are born, the third largest Muslim country of the World [Bangladesh]”

Dr. Ahmad please tell me (by placing your right hand on your chest) that those women leaders in Bangladesh (BD) are the product of Islamic rule? Is Bangladesh governed by Islamic Sharia laws? Are you kidding? Do you think Islam really support their leadership? Don’t you know Koran (Sura Al-Nur) asked all women to stay quiet inside their home and never should go out alone? So, when you wish—Bangladesh is an Islamic nation, but SA is not? Is it your Islamic honesty Dr. Ahmad? For your information—Bangladesh is the best democratic and secular country among the Muslim nation today. Women status is improving in BD only because of democratic and secular Government and all those women leaders are the product of democracy and secularism. Islamists like Jamaatis goons (your brothers) never like to see any women leaders in BD because Islam does not permit women leadership. Show me some women leaders from SA, Iran, Afghanistan or Sudan where Islamic sharia is the law of the land. Or, show me some educated women leaders or scholars from the period of Islamic Calipates from the ancient Arabia. Islam denigrated women from all sides and that is why in every muslim nations in general and all Islamically ruled (Sharia-based) nations women are considered inferior to men and sometimes less than human. Readers can read some hadiths how much Islam is disrespectful to women in general HERE.

 

Link1 - Link2

Dr. Ahmad said:

“Again you lied about the age of Ayesha (may Allah bless her). Why you are making Islam responsible for the early marriage of girls?”

Yes, Islam permits and encourages child marriage since 54 year old Prophet of Islam married Ayesha when she was only 6 year old and he slept with this child bride when Ayesha was only 9 year old. Below are some proofs:

Sahih Muslim Book 008, Number 3310:
'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 65
Narrated 'Aisha:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that 'Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death)." what you know of the Quran (by heart)'

Sahih Bukhari 7.18
Narrated 'Ursa:
The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for 'Aisha's hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said "But I am your brother." The Prophet said, "You are my brother in Allah's religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry."
Sahih Bukhari 9.140

Narrated 'Aisha:
Allah's Apostle said to me, "You were shown to me twice (in my dream) before I married you. I saw an angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said to him, 'Uncover (her),' and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), 'If this is from Allah, then it must happen.' Then you were shown to me, the angel carrying you in a silken piece of cloth, and I said (to him), 'Uncover (her), and behold, it was you. I said (to myself), 'If this is from Allah, then it must happen.' "

Because of the above glaring example left behind by the Prophet, Muslims today love to emulate the Prophetic tradition to please Allah. Iranian constitution consider women’s adulthood when they turn 9 year old. Imam Khomeini sanctioned that every girl be married at 9 and their first period occurs at the husband’s house. Of course, child marriage can be present in some poor non-muslim nations mostly because of economical reason; but muslims are practicing this immoral habit by the license of Prophetic tradition and religion. Same is the case of polygamy in Islam. Iran also practices “Razam” stoning death as the Islamic punishment for adultery.

Dr. Ahmad said:

“Nowhere in the mentioned verses it was said that all the girls were used to bury alive. So once again you lied with the meaning of the verses. You also lied about the prophet and his followers of using concubines, slave girls in their harems.”

For hundreds of years Islamic Mullah’s main slogan was: Islam brought light to the Arabia’s Iyyam-e-Jahelia (dark age of Arab) were constantly spewing this lie that Pagan Arabs were burying their all new-born female children. Nobody said how many they buried. Therefore gullible people believed this lie (along with many other mouthful lies) and gave bravo to Islam for saving all female population of Arabia. Now, it is up to you to disprove what I said about this. Killing one or two female child can be found even today’s society in many countries for special reason. So how this sporadic female child killing in Arabia was any big deal? Islamists used this lie to impress people how good Islam was for women! Could you deny this fact?

Now your challenge about sex with slave girls and concubines. Please judge following verses and sahih Hadiths yourself to find the truth:

(QURAN - 33:50): "O Prophet, We have made lawful to you the wives whom you have granted dowries and the captive and slave girls whom God has given you as booty; and the daughters of your ’Amm (paternal uncles) and the daughters of your ’Ammah (paternal aunts) and the daughters of your Khâl (maternal uncles) and the daughters of your Khâlah (maternal aunts) who migrated (from Makkah) with you,…….”

(QURAN - 70:22-30): "Not so the worshippers, who are steadfast in prayer, who set aside a due portion of their wealth for the beggar and for the deprived, who truly believe in the Day of Reckoning and dread the punishment of their Lord (for none is secure from the punishment of their Lord); who restrain their carnal desire except with their wives and the (captives) whom their right hands possess,- for (then) they are not to be blamed.

QURAN - 23:5,6: "...who restrain their carnal desires except with their wives and slave girls, for these are lawful to them..." Again, Muslim men were allowed to have sexual relations with their wives and slave girls.

QURAN - 4:24: "And all married women are forbidden unto you save those captives whom your right hand possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. (Muhammad Pickthall's English translation of the Quran).

Also read these verses how Prophet of Islam plundered wealth’s and land from the people in Medina:

Quran-33:26- “And He brought those of the People of the Book [Jewish people of Banu Qurayza] who supported them from their fortresses and cast terror into their hearts, some of them you slew (beheaded) and some you took prisoners (captive)”

Quran-33:27- “And He made you heirs of their lands, their houses, and their goods, and of a land which ye had not frequented (before). And Allah has power over all things.”

Quran-8:67 - “It is not fitting for an Apostle that he should have prisoners of war until He thoroughly subdued the land….” (Allah insisting Prophet to kill all the prisoners, and should not keep any surrendered prisoners alive until He (Prophet occupied entire Arabia).”

Quran-8:69  - “But (now) enjoy what ye took in war (booty), lawful and good; but fear God…” (Allah encouraging Muslims to accept booty spoils of war “Maal-E-Ganimat”)

These above Quranic verses revealed some unpleasant truths:

The verses: 33:50 ; 70:22-30; 23:5-6 and 4:24 gave permanent and wide license to have sex with salve girls and concubines. The remaining verses are the glaring evidences how Prophet destroyed anybody who did not accept his Islam and widely occupied their lands and wealth, enslaved them like warlords as booty from Allah.

Quranic Tafsir supported Banu Qurayza massacre:

Maulana A. Yousuf Ali stated:

“The men of the Quraiza were slain; the women were sold as captives of war (booty); and their lands and properties were distributed or divided among the Muhajirs (Yousuf Ali’s tafsir for Sura Ahzab)”.

Maulana Mufti Muhammad Shafi) writes:

“Allah ordered Prophet not to keep any war prisoners until entire land is occupied; because by killing enemy prisoners will crush morals of unvbelievers. Some disciples such as Siddique Akbar (ra) suggested tom keep war prisoners to earn ransoms; but Hazrat Omar ibn Khattab (ra) and Hazrat s’aad ibn muaaz (ra) suggested to kill all able-bodied war prisonesrs (In sura A’nfal (#8): Tafsir by Maulana Mufti Muhammad Shafi).

Hadiths supporting sex with salves girls:

Bukhari vol.3 book 34 (Book of Sales i.e. Bargains) ch.111 no.432 p.237. "Narrated Abu Sai’id Al-Khudri that while he was sitting with Allah’s Apostle he said, ‘Oh Allah’s Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices (selling and buying slaves in open market), what is your opinion about coitus interruptus?’ [a sexual practice] The Prophet said, ‘Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it, No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence."

Bukhari vol.5 book 59 (Book of Military Expeditions) ch.31 no.459 p.317. and also Bukhari vol.8 book 77 (Book of al-Qadr) ch.3 no.600 p.391.
"Narrated Ibn Muhairiz: I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Sa’id Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-’Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Sai’id said, ‘We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa [battle] of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interruptus, we said, ‘How can we do coitus interrupts before asking Allah’s Apostle who is present among us?’ We asked (him) about it and he said, ‘It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul till the Day of Resurrection is predestined to exist, it will exist."

Quran and Hadiths support Muslims to have sex with slave girls and Prophet of Islam to had sex with slave girls and concubines (Quran: 33:50) and killed all men and enslaved women and children with war prisoners. Now some evidences that Prophet Muhammad also had sex with slave girls and concubines:

Juwairiya: [Bukhari 3.46.717] also in [sahih Muslim 019. 4292] 
Ibn Aun has narrated: “I wrote a letter to Nafi and Nafi wrote in reply to my letter that the Prophet had suddenly attacked Bani Mustaliq without warning while they were heedless and their cattle were being watered at the places of water. Their fighting men were killed and their women and children were taken as captives; the Prophet got Juwairiya on that day. Nafi said that Ibn 'Umar had told him the above narration and that Ibn 'Umar was in that army.”

Juwairiya was one of the captives during the raid of Banu Mustaliq. When all the prisoners were made slaves and distributed among the victorious Muslim soldiers, Juwairiyah fell to the lot of Thabit bin Qais. She was the daughter of Haris, the leader of the clan.

Safiyah [story according to Ibn Ishaq, p. 766]

Safiyah was a beautiful 17 years old Jewish woman who was captured when Muhammad’s troops raided Kheibar. She was the daughter or Huyeiy Ibn Akhtab, the chief of the Banu Nadir, a Jewish tribe of Medina , whom Muhammad had beheaded two years earlier along with the men of Banu Quriaza. The tribe of Banu Nadir had been already banished from Medina and their properties were confiscated.

Safiyah had married to her cousin Kinana, who was a young Jewish leader of Kheibar. When Muhammad raided that fortress, he killed its unarmed men and captured the rest. A Jewish traitor, (reminds me of Noam Chomsky) to gain Muhammad’s favor and be spared from death, told him that Kinana was the treasurer of the town and that he used to hide the money in some ruins. Muhammad ordered Kinana to be tortured to reveal the whereabouts of the treasures and killed him.

Then he asked the prettiest woman from amongst that captives to be brought to him. Ibn Ishaq writes:

"The apostle occupied the Jewish forts one after the other, taking prisoners as he went. Among these were Safiya, the wife of Kinana, the Khaibar chief, and two female cousins: [sisters of Kinana] the apostle chose Safiya for himself. The other prisoners were distributed among the Muslims. Bilal brought Safiya to the apostle, and they passed the bodies of several Jews on the way. Safiya's female companions lamented and strewed dust on their heads. When the apostle of Allâh observed this scene, he said, 'Remove these she devils from me.' But he ordered Safiya to remain, and threw his reda [cloak] over her. So the Muslims knew he had reserved her for his own. The apostle reprimanded Bilal, saying, 'Hast thou lost all feelings of mercy, to make women pass by the corpses of their husbands?'”

Safiyah was taken to Muhammad’s tent. Muhammad wanted to have sex with her on that very night, only hours after torturing to death her husband. She resisted his advances. That night Abu Ayyub al-Ansari guarded the tent of Muhammad. When, in the early dawn, Muhammad saw Abu Ayyub strolling up and down, he asked him what he meant by this sentry-go; he replied:

"I was afraid for you with this young lady. You had killed her father, her husband and many of her relatives, I was really afraid for you on her account". (Ibn Ishaq, p. 766)

The next day Muhammad covered Safiyah with his mantle, an act signifying that she is now his. Safiyah was groomed and made-up for Muhammad by Umm Sulaim, the mother of Anas ibn Malik and was taken to Muhammad who married her in a mock marriage ceremony and raped her that night. Muslims call this marriage. I call that rape. I am certain not many young women would like to jump into bed with an old man who happens to be the murderer of their father and husband and many other relatives. That poor woman had no choice; therefore that marriage was nothing but a mockery of this sacred institution. At that time Muhammad was close to sixty years old.

Rayhanah:

Another victim of Muhammad was Rayhana, a 15 year old girl from the tribe of Banu Quraiza. Muhammad massacred all the men of that tribe. Then women were brought to him to pick and he chose Rayhana. Rayhana never married Muhammad and unlike Juwairiyah and Safiyah never feigned being a Muslim to have an easier life. She preferred to remain a sex slave rather the wife of the murderer of her father, brothers and uncles. .

Maria the Coptic slave girl:

So, when Muqwaqis, the Christian Ruler of Alexandria presented Muhammad with Mariyah Qibtia (ibn Ishaq, p. 653), a pretty and sexy young girl, Muhammad could not resist himself to engage in sex with her. In fact, he purportedly impregnated her, and she gave birth to Ibrahim, Muhammad's only son who survived for 18 months. The entire Sura Tahrim (Surah: Q. 66:1-5) deals with this issue. The Quran provides certain exemptions to Muhammad. Allah allowed only Muhammad to have unrestricted sex without marriage with his first cousin sisters, and women who willingly surrender her person to him.

Maulana Yusuf Ali (commentary number 3754, p. 1123) writes:

"This was revealed in A.H. 7. After that the Prophet did not marry again, except the handmaiden Mary the Copt, who was sent as a present by the Christians Muaqauqas of Egypt. She became the mother of Ibrahim, who died in his infancy."

Affair with Mary in Muhammad’s harem : (Ibn Sa’d, Abu Abd Allah Muhammad, Kitab al-Tabaqat, vol ii. Translated in English by S. Moinul Haq, Kitab Bhavan, 1784, Kalam Mahal, Daraya Ganj, New Delhi, India, 1972).

Volume iv. Ch.26: Narrated by Muhammad ibn Sad-al Tabkat al-Kobra—“One day Prophet (PBUH) asked Hafsa to visit her father Hazrat Umar who had requested a visit of his daughter Hafsa. Hafsa went to pay a visit to her father, Umar, but Umar was not at home. When he (Umar) returns, he asked Hafsa why she had come. Hafsa said it was him (Umar) who asked her to come! Then Umar replied that he never asked for her visit.

At that time, Muhammad was staying at her quarter. Hafsa returned unexpectedly and found Muhmmad sleeping with Mary in her own private room. She was furious and threatened to disclose the secret. Afraid of scandal and to appease her, Muhammad begged her to keep the matter quiet and promised to desert Mary altogether. Hafsa, however, did not bother to keep the promise. She told this secret to Aisha who was equally indignant over the affair. The scandal soon spread over the entire harem. Muhammad developed displeasure for his wives. At this time he received a message from heaven not to separate himself from Mary. Then he chided Hafsa and other wives. He threatened to divorce all them for their insubordination and disloyalty. He then withdrew himself and went into seclusion for a whole month and lived alone with Mary. Umar and Abu Bakr were greatly disturbed at the desertion of their daughters for a menial concubine. They went to Muhammad and pleaded him to come out of his recluse. Gabriel came and told Muhammad about the good qualities of Hafsa and recommended him to take her back. So, Muhammad pardoned them all and returned to their apartments as before. This is referred in verse 66:1-5.

The following Sahi hadith will support the episode described above:

This Sahi Hadis is from Sahih Bukhari : Background to 66.4 and 33:28 --- Muhammad did not see his wives for a month; he slept with Mariyah in the bed of Hafsa while lied to Hafsa that Umar wanted to see Hafsar...3.43.651 .
This hadis is very lengthy. I quoting only the relevent part:

[.................... 'Umar told the whole story (about his wife). "On that the Prophet smiled." 'Umar further said, "I then said, 'I went to Hafsa and said to her: Do not be tempted to imitate your companion ('Aisha) for she is more beautiful than you and more beloved to the Prophet.' The Prophet smiled again. When I saw him smiling, I sat down and cast a glance at the room, and by Allah, I couldn't see anything of importance but three hides. I said (to Allah's Apostle) "Invoke Allah to make your followers prosperous for the Persians and the Byzantines have been made prosperous and given worldly luxuries, though they do not worship Allah?' The Prophet was leaning then (and on hearing my speech he sat straight) and said, 'O Ibn Al-Khatttab! Do you have any doubt (that the Hereafter is better than this world)? These people have been given rewards of their good deeds in this world only.' I asked the Prophet . 'Please ask Allah's forgiveness for me. The Prophet did not go to his wives because of the secret which Hafsa had disclosed to 'Aisha, and he said that he would not go to his wives for one month as he was angry with them when Allah admonished him (for his oath that he would not approach Maria). When twenty-nine days had passed, the Prophet went to Aisha first of all. She said to him, 'You took an oath that you would not come to us for one month, and today only twenty-nine days have passed, as I have been counting them day by day.' The Prophet said, 'The month is also of twenty-nine days.' That month consisted of twenty-nine days. 'Aisha said, 'When the Divine revelation of Choice was revealed, the Prophet started with me, saying to me, 'I am telling you something, but you needn't hurry to give the reply till you can consult your parents." 'Aisha knew that her parents would not advise her to part with the Prophet . The Prophet said that Allah had said:--

'O Prophet! Say To your wives; If you desire The life of this world And its glitter, ... then come! I will make a provision for you and set you free In a handsome manner. But if you seek Allah And His Apostle, and The Home of the Hereafter, then Verily, Allah has prepared For the good-doers amongst you A great reward.' (33.28) 'Aisha said, 'Am I to consult my parents about this? I indeed prefer Allah, His Apostle, and the Home of the Hereafter.' After that the Prophet gave the choice to his other wives and they also gave the same reply as 'Aisha did." ]

All about Prophet’s sex with maria the Coptic slave:
Bukhari, Vol. 8, book-74, No. 257
Bukhari vol.1, book-8, No.395
Bukhari, vol-3, Book-43, No. 648 (slept with maria)
Koranic verses : 33:59, 32, 50;

Demanding sex from slaves is just following Muhammad's example (slowly under pressure some Muslim countries must pretend they comply with the secular laws)

 Why stop sleeping with Maria yourself: 66:1, 2, 5, 3, and 66:19-11, 4:34

“O Prophet! Why do you ban (for yourself) that which Allâh has made lawful to you, seeking to please your wives?"

And Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful” (Quran-66:1).

The story of Muhammad having sex with Mariyah in Hafsa'a bed is found in Muir's biography of Muhammad. This immoral story was narrated like this:

One-day Muhammad goes to Hafsa’s house and upon setting gaze at her maid Mariyah, he finds her attractive and decides to get laid. He sends Hafsa to Omar’s house, telling her that her father wanted to see her (a lie). When Hafsa leaves, Muhammad takes Mariyah to bed and has intercourse with her. Meanwhile Hafsa, who finds out that her father was not expecting her, returns home much sooner than expected, and to her surprise finds her illustrious husband in bed with her maid.

She becomes hysteric and forgetting the station of the prophet she shouts and causes a scandal. The prophet pleads with her to calm down and promises not to sleep with Mariah again and bades her also not to divulge that secret to others.

Hafsa would not control herself and relays everything to Ayisha who also turns against the prophet and jointly with his other wives cause him much anguish. So the prophet decides to punish all of them by not sleeping with them for one month. However Muhammad was angry with all of his wives for having ganged up against him and on the spur of the moment he made the oath not to sleep with any of them for one month. That of course would have been too much hardship for the beloved messenger of God. Therefore God in his mercy comes to the aid of his prophet and reveals the Surah Tahrim (Banning). In this Surah Allah gently rebukes Muhammad for being so hard on himself and for depriving himself from what he really likes and has been made lawful to him, in order to please his wives.

The following is the text of this funny Surah: Q. 66:1-5. (From Dr. AliSina’s essay “Immorality and lewdness”)

1. O Prophet! Why do you ban (for yourself) that which Allâh has made lawful to you, seeking to please your wives? And Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
2. Allâh has already ordained for you (O men), the dissolution of your oaths. And Allâh is your Maula (Lord, or Master, or Protector, etc.) and He is the All-Knower, the All-Wise.
3. And (remember) when the Prophet (SAW) disclosed a matter in confidence to one of his wives (Hafsah), so when she told it (to another i.e. 'Aishah), and Allâh made it known to him, he informed part thereof and left a part. Then when he told her (Hafsah) thereof, she said: "Who told you this?" He said: "The All-Knower, the All-Aware (Allâh) has told me".
4. If you two (wives of the Prophet SAW, namely 'Aishah and Hafsah) turn in repentance to Allâh, (it will be better for you), your hearts are indeed so inclined (to oppose what the Prophet SAW likes), but if you help one another against him (Muhammad SAW), then verily, Allâh is his Maula (Lord, or Master, or Protector, etc.), and Jibrael (Gabriel), and the righteous among the believers, and furthermore, the angels are his helpers.
5. It may be if he divorced you (all) that his Lord will give him instead of you, wives better than you, Muslims (who submit to Allâh), believers, obedient to Allâh, turning to Allâh in repentance, worshipping Allâh sincerely, fasting or emigrants (for Allâh's sake), previously married and virgins. “

Although Muhammad gave his word to Hafsa, not to have sex with her maid, he could not resist the temptation. Especially now that he had taken another oath not to sleep with all of his wives. It was a difficult situation. On one hand he had to keep up his word or risk losing face and on the other he was not the kind of man that liked to deprive himself of pleasures. A solution had to be found and no one but Allah could help him. Well, nothing is impossible when you are the prophet of Allah. Leave everything in the hands of the Almighty and let him take care of it. And that is exactly what Muhammad did. Allah himself intervened and gave his favorite prophet the green light to follow his heart's desire. In the Surah Tahrim God licensed his beloved prophet to have his fling and not pay attention to his wives. What can a prophet ask more? Allah was so concerned about Muhammad's carnal pleasures that he even allowed ALL MEN to break their oaths as a bounty. Subhanillah. Isn't Allah great?

It is also worthy of mention that Muhammad who came to know that Hafsa did reveal the secret to Aisha, lied to her by pretending that it was Allah who told him so (verse 3) while he actually learned it from Aisha.

In reaction to the above verses, Ayisha, who was not only young and pretty but also clever, is reported to have said to Muhammad, "Your God indeed rushes in coming to your aid!"

Explaining the Surah Tahrim (66) Omar is reported to have said:

Bukhari Volume 3, Book 43, Number 648:
The Prophet did not go to his wives because of the secret which Hafsa had disclosed to 'Aisha, and he said that he would not go to his wives for one month as he was angry with them when Allah admonished him (for his oath that he would not approach Mariyah). This story must have been embarrassing for Muhammad’s followers even when they gobbled mindlessly everything he told them. So they made other hadiths to explain those verses of the Quran that were already explained by Omar.

Sahih Muslim Book 009, Number 3496:
'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) narrated that Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) used to spend time with Zainab daughter of Jahsh and drank honey at her house. She ('A'isha further) said: I and Hafsa agreed that one whom Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) would visit first should say: I notice that you have an odour of the Maghafir (gum of mimosa). He (the Holy Prophet) visited one of them and she said to him like this, whereupon he said: I have taken honey in the house of Zainab bint Jabsh and I will never do it again. It was at this (that the following verse was revealed): 'Why do you hold to be forbidden what Allah has made lawful for you... (up to). If you both ('A'isha and Hafsa) turn to Allah" up to:" 
And when the Holy Prophet confided an information to one of his wives" (lxvi. 3). This refers to his saying: But I have taken honey.

Also Sahih Muslim Book 009, Number 3497

Conclusion:

The existence of the above Hadith and its difference with the one narrated by Omar reveals yet another fact that the companions of Muhammad were willing to lie, (as Muslims are today) to preserve the image of their prophet from blemish. Fact of the matter is above lies are nothing if you compare them with his biggest lie which is Allah talked with him (Muhammad) through Gabriel. His lie started with his message that Allah started to talk with him inside the cave Hira like a devout pet-parrot.

Dr. Ahmad, I hope you got enough now to understand who actually lied about Islam! I have given you enough references to substantiate my claim and if you need more I can give more, since references for these immoral life style of ancient Islamists are staggering in the Koran and Hdiths books. By the way, all these verses and hadiths are pure (verbatim) and nothing has been made-up by anybody but Allah and Prophet of Islam. If you have references to counter my arguments then bring them up!

In your credential I learned that you were dean of the faculty of science! I wonder what is your discipline of science! A scientist can not be so blind with some folklore stories of religion Islam. Since you are a scientist, do you believe in the Darwin’s Evolution too?

Besides, you claimed you had the profession of teacher—a noble profession. Did your student answer your questions in the exam same manner like you did, so crazily and irrelevantly?

You are asking me to stay away from NFB, as if, it is your father’s property! NFB is a public forum in which anybody can post his write-ups and it is absolutely by the discretion of the authority of NFB. Why don’t you post your article in FFI, IW, or IM or MM sites? Please send your article to them and I am 100% sure that they will gladly post your articles there. Of course, you shall have to be ready for dissecting your articles wildly by the Islamic critics there. Because, all your claims of Islamic goodies will be only your lip-service, full of lies and imaginary with no proofs whatsoever.

Let me ask you my final questions. Why can’t you bring just one example of any Islamic state (Past and present) where you are able to show anything good about Islamic governance and justice? Could you tell me why out of four so called rightly guided Islamic Caliphs—three of them were brutally assassinated? What was the source of income of those ancient Islamic Caliphs, (other than invading the neighboring Arab tribes, plundering, pillaging, killings all males and enslaving women and children) other than looting other tribes and taking war booties (Mal-e-Gani-maat) from the defeated tribes? I invite you to prove that—Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sudan and Talibani Afghanistan and Part of Somalia are not the glaring examples of ancient Islamic paradise of Arabia. Come on, give us your points why SA and Iran are not true Islamic states in this modern world.


References:

1. Holy Koran, Sahih Hadiths and Islamic histories available in the present day world.
2. Saudi Arabia’s constitution : http://www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/sa00000_.html

 

Last Updated on Sunday, 26 December 2010 08:36  

AIM Listed by NLA

pandora

Australian Islamist Monitor's web publications were selected for preservation by the National Library of Australia. Access to our materials stored in the NLA Archive is facilitated in two ways: via the Library’s online catalogue; and via subject and title lists maintained on the PANDORA home page.
Click HERE for direct access to the archive

Islam Kills

History - Articles

Lest We Forget the Battle of Tours

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Australians celebrate and revere Anzac Day on April 25th each year in remembrance of our brave soldiers who fought in two great world wars to secure our freedom. Every Australian identifies with the slogan “lest we forget” and in services held around the country people reflect on the battles and men who died to secure our freedom. Yet across the world in France, there is one remarkable battle which helped form the Europe we know today and allowed the development of civilization based on Judeo Christian principles. This one famous battle has become known as the battle of Tours and effectively stopped the Muslim advance into Europe. After the death of Mohammed in 632AD, Muslim armies exploded out of the Arabian peninsula to conquer much of the Middle East, expanding across north Africa. From there they crossed into Spain in 711AD and eventually controlled much of al-Andalus by 715AD. It was the victory at Tours by Charles Martel that stemmed the tide and eventually the Muslim marauders were expelled from Spain in 1492 when the last outpost at Granada fell to King Ferdinand of Spain. 

Read more

Shivaji’s Coronation Laudatory Landmark

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Infidels' Resistance

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was born, lived, fought and won battles against religious and social oppression in the 17th century Bharat or India. He was a shining star in the Indian firmament and is renowned as a champion of the downtrodden and depressed masses. He was and continues to be an icon for the classes and masses alike and is seen as a rallying point for peasants oppressed by foreign rulers, Pathans and Moghuls alike. Sexually exploited women found in Shivaji Raje a protector, a benefactor and flocked to his Hindavi Swaraj to find solace and feel liberated under his saffron flag. 

Read more


Ransomer of Captives from the Muslims

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Perhaps some readers might be interested to know that January 28 is considered a feast day among Catholics – actually 2 feast days are celebrated on the same day – one is of ST Thomas Aquinas, the great medieval theologian and philosopher who adapted Aristotle to the western Judeo-Christian worldview. . It is also the feast day of a lesser known person – St Peter Nolasco, the great ransomer of captives from the Muslims.

Read more


Islamic Pirates

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Barbary Corsair
Somalian Islamic Pirates & Lessons from History
 
The dramatic rescue of the American cargo-ship captain Richard Phillips from the hands of Somalian Islamic pirates by the U.S. Navy—killing three pirates, holding him hostage at gun-point, through precision-targeting—warrants a review of the U.S. struggle with piracy and hostage-taking in North Africa, which ended two centuries ago.

Raiding trade-caravans and hostage-taking for extracting ransom in Islam was started by Prophet Muhammad. Having become powerful and secure after his relocation to Medina from Mecca in 622, Muhammad initiated Jihad or holy war in the form of raids of trade-caravans for earning livelihood for his community. In the first successful raid of a Meccan caravan at Nakhla in December 623, his brigands killed one of the attendants, took two of them captive, and acquired the caravan as “sacred” booty. The captives were ransomed to generate further revenue. Muhammad, later on, expanded this mode of Jihad to raiding non-Muslim communities around Arabia—for capturing their homes, properties and livestock, capturing their women and children as slaves often for ransoming and selling, and imposing extortional taxes—which sometimes involved mass-slaughter of the attacked victims.

Read more


The Battle of Broken Hill

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

Battle of Broken Hill Logo
 
The First Islamic Terrorist Attack on Australian Soil
 
On January 1, 1915 two Broken Hill men, both former camel drivers, armed themselves with rifles, an homemade flag bearing Islamic insignia and a large supply of ammunition and launched a surprise attack on the Picnic Train about 3 kilometres outside Broken Hill.

The train carried about 1200 Broken Hill residents to Silverton where a picnic to celebrate the new year was to take place.

The two Muslim men, Gool Mohamed originally a Pashtun tribesman from Afghanistan and Mullah Abdullah from what is known today as Pakistan, decided to wage jihad against Australian infidels after Australia and the Ottoman Empire officially joined the opposite sides in the WWI.

Read more


Jihad Galore

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Jihad Galore and the Toledo Whore

Battle of Higueruela

Alhambra - GazelleHow often in conversation with a Muslim, do they quote Spain as the crowning achievement of Islam, where Muslims, Jews and Christians lived in harmony for about 800 years?

And when you mention the killings and massacres, you are told that the Spanish Inquisition was much worse.
This is a misconception, since the Inquisition in Spain was responsible for only between 4,000 and 5,000 lives. [1]

Yet in 1066AD, in a single day, muslims murdered over 4,000 Jews because Vizier Joseph ibn Naghrela had risen to a position greater than them, and of course, this upset the Muslim sensitivities. [2]

Read more


Arabs Hated The Quran

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

 
How the Arabs Hated The Quran
 
Old Quran

Wh y are you a Muslim?
Musli ms in general love to hear the above question because it has a simple and readymade answer in their minds besides it gives them the opp or t u nity to propagate their religion and talk proudly about Islam.

 

Read more


Lepanto Anniversary

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Decisive Victory for the West

At this time of year, it is timely to remember one of the greatest victories of the west against the Islamic world. On the 7th October in 1571, Don Juan and the Holy League, led by Admiral Doria, defeated the larger Ottoman fleet in the Battle of Lepanto, saving Europe from the Turks and militant Islam. The Holy League was a coalition of different armies - of the Republic of Venice, the Papacy (under Pope Pius V), Spain (including Naples, Sicily and Sardinia), the Republic of Genoa, the Duchy of Savoy, the Knights Hospitaller and some others.

Read more


Muslim Jerusalem

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

Jerusalem - Coat of ArmsWhy do Muslims insist that Jerusalem is their Holy City?
When Mohamed and his faithful followers moved from Mecca to Medina, they found themselves among three Jewish tribes/clans (BANU-L-NADIR, BANU KAINUKA and BANU KURAIZA)  which settled there some time after their expulsion from their homeland and also living there were  two Arab, pagan tribes.

Mohammed, who at this stage needed more followers, decided to win those tribes over and convert them to his newly invented religion.

Islam was yet not as fully developed as we know it today, and Mohammed was still having his sessions with Allah (the Medina period revelations).

Read more


Killing of Banu Quraiza

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Did Prophet Muhammad order Killing Surrendered Jews of Banu Quraiza and Khaybar?  A historical Analysis

In the post 9/11 era of this modern-world, Islamists around the globe are busy with ‘damage control utopia’ in order to correct the image of religion Islam. We all know that the nucleus of Islam are: Quran, Hadiths (Sunnah) supported by Islamic histories and biographies recorded by various famous Islamic scholars and historians.

What Mecca?

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Early History

A great tragedy of the Islamic control of our universities and political correctness plus the fear of extreme violence if anyone dares question the roots and claims of Islam is ...that nobody dares question the roots and claims of Islam!!!  I want to stimulate interest and offer this summary of information on Mecca from (LINK) which discusses some problems with Muslim claims in a comparison of evidence supporting Islam/Christianity. 

Read more


Yahweh or Hubal

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

FlagThere is a very strongly entrenched view among majority of Westerners today that the three main monotheistic religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam share one common God and therefore despite the obvious differences, the core foundation of these three religions is the same. 

Read more