Australian Islamist Monitor

Islam Under Scrutiny

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Dr Michael Kindler's review of "Learning from one another"

E-mail Print PDF

Anne, in her comment "DUTCH DISCOVERY & SETTLEMENT OF HOLLANDIA NOVA" to "LFOA Analysis - Education or Indoctrination?" dated June 23, 2010 asked for an analysis of Dr Michael Kindler's review of "Learning from one another".

Thank you Anne for the link, and here it is:

Dr Michael Kindler, Manager for Curriculum Support at the Department of Education & Training in Canberra, has offered a  review of the teachers manual "Learning from one another" (LFOA). What follows is an analysis of his review.

Words are important. At the risk of sounding trivial, words are used by the mind to evoke an imagery built through their structures and the links they establish with already existing knowledge we have acquired along the way. First and foremost they give meaning to what we hear or read because of their power to create a landscape in our minds. Often they span a  number of inflections, sometimes subtly differentiated branch-offs from the stem, much like a meadow unfolds into various patches as we get closer.

Those patches can be more important than we realise. The subtlety of a tone may not be expressed openly but could nevertheless be the reason a certain expression has been chosen due to its embeddedness within the semantic structure held by the writer. We may read about a meadow, but we learn about this particular meadow because the author found something special among one of its patches without referring to the latter as such.

The title of the review, "Is Australia a harmonious knowledge economy?", evokes curiosity prompted by the question. But 'economy' covers more than "a system of production and distribution and consumption" [a]. Immediately following the most common interpretation we find references to 'efficiency', 'frugality', 'careful use' and even 'thrift'.

Does Dr Kindler ask us to consider whether Australia uses information frugally in order to be harmonious, should we question whether Australians are orderly in their thrift and therefore still - or no longer - harmonious?

Or could it be that LFOA is in fact rather frugal with its information which subsequently segued into Dr Kindler's overall perception of the text?

He writes, "Recent waves of migration are adding new and different cultural values to Australia which, if we are open to learning about them, will indelibly enrich all our lives and bring as yet unimagined creativity and prosperity". These new and different cultural values will, so he tells us, enhance our creativity and prosperity provided we import them - the latter being the stated consequence of the former. What he does not  mention is the possibility of one particular value being contrary to another; surely so many events around the world are testimony to just that. Given such clashes the ingestion of all values regardless would not necessarily result in richness and prosperity but could create the exact opposite.

Perhaps he sees differences as something positive per se and commonality as a negative. Why else would he say, "Gone are the days of English as the mono-imperial and economically dominant global language. Chinese, Arabic and Spanish have replaced the number of English internet sites, and gone is the tyranny of distance, thanks to vastly faster and improved Information and Communication Technology."

To examine languages in terms of their inherent sustainability goes beyond the present scope. Suffice to say that the more flexible and adaptive a language is, the more will it be capable of holding its own against others. English may have been spread across the globe during the age of colonialism, but since then its propensity for importing expressions from anywhere else made it the lingua franca of today. For that reason it also enables people from different backgrounds to understand each other, which, by the way, is one factor that does promote  richness and creativity - especially since technology makes the real-time connection among them all so easy.

"This teaching resource is a well researched, well prepared and well thought-through set of lessons and workshops aimed to promote intercultural understanding in a contemporary world."

By that sentence the reader would expect great detail contributing to the assumed understanding. Alas, LFOA falls short on all counts as a perusal would quickly demonstrate; the reader of this review has been mislead.

Dr Kindler's assertion, "The activities are geared to increase knowledge of what is still relatively unknown in most Australian classrooms", is similarly off the mark. Reading LFOA shows a clear lack of explanation of all those unknowns beyond a cursory listing of these items and no more.

Once again we are warned against commonality: "These classrooms have been historically characterised by an Anglo-Saxon and Christian-centric cultural approach dominated by English as the language of instruction". Wouldn't pupils in New South Wales learn about their state first and the rest later, wouldn't classes in Shanghai focus on their city first, and so on, and would they not learn about their history under the auspices of China rather than France or India or Australia for that matter?

Given that LFOA steers well away from providing a direct translation of Arabic terms the lauded linguistic diversity doesn't exist anyway, even assuming Australian children would find being spoken to in Arabic helpful.

Dr Kindler's choice of words in "The Diaspora of Muslims..." could be due to a negligent use of the word 'Diaspora' [b] or
represents an intended deflection of what the spreading of Islamic actually meant. The word is understood to mean a 'dispersion'(especially one suffered by the Jews - note the submersed element of victimhood smuggled in here), in other words an act committed by someone upon someone else.

Muslims were not dispersed, they actively invaded others and dispersed those.

Writing "...Asia literacy..." uses a metaphor to circumscribe a more than superficial understanding of Asia, just as 'English  literacy' goes beyond the mere vocabulary. If this is what is  meant LFOA does not, as mentioned already, provide a deeper  knowledge about Asia, it simply uses a collection of keywords  without any attempt to allow their intended users to place them  in a productive context.

The sentence, "Did you know that Australian secondary schools currently spend the least amount of time learninglanguages other than English of all advanced industrial OECD member nations?", firstly uses a negative as representative of ourselves in order to elevate the other, i.e. LFOA, by default.
Secondly, the metaphor meant to link to a paucity in teaching  other languages to the manual is misplaced in this case  because LFOA explicitly states that accurate translations from Arabic are not its aim.

Sometimes an expression has a sufficient semantic distance to be meaningful to more than one stem (a case of linguistic homology). "Remaining ignorant of Islam is a threat to Australia..." is one such example. In Dr Kindler's view not being informed about Islam represents a threat to the assumed value of indiscriminate cultural absorption. Since that view can be challenged (see above) the alternative is to see 'threat' as something related to a lack of understanding about a danger.

Since Islam does contain problematic aspects Dr Kindler's wording is still correct, albeit under different circumstances.

If the superficial approach in LFOA is necessary in order to gloss over so much that would be unpalatable otherwise, "...without relentless promotion of intercultural understanding and knowledge of other cultures..." attains a rather sinister aspect. The promotion would indeed have to be "relentless" for it to be effective.

Saying "...our future will remain imperilled..." falls into the same category as "Remaining ignorant of Islam is a threat to Australia...", discussed previously. As it is a repetition of type it can be assumed Dr Kindler has more than a passing interest in obfuscating what does and does not present a threat to us.

"Instead of relying on sensationalist and terrorist focussed media perceptions of what is often loosely, even erroneously, described as Muslim in character..." are weasel words [c] that hide the action they are meant to stand for. If one out of ten terrorist attacks is perpetrated by a Muslim it could be called a coincidence, but if nine out of ten are committed by Muslims describing them as "Muslim in character" is not erroneous - it is to the point.

The subconscious internalisation of LOFA's nature and now dressed in the tendentious appeasement practised throughout the review shows itself in the statement, "[LFOA] goes a very long way to develop a more variegated...understanding of Islam...". Given that 'variegate' means 'to make varied in appearance or colour', what Dr Kindler really means is that LFOA has varied the concept of Islam to make it suitable for inexperienced children. Hence such things as halal food, dogmatic habits, etc. have been changed in terms of their appearance to be embraced more easily by the rest of us.

Assuming that, in the interest of multicultural diversity, it would be an advantage to consider "how to get students to think outside the envelope of their immediate experiences" then one would equally have to assume the same for Muslims and their pervasive codes, particularly when it is them who are the newcomers.

When the review tells us, "With rich illustrations of Islamic contributions to science and mathematics..." and "there are activities to learn about such things as Afghan camels in Australia, or the historical significance of the Crusades as seen through Muslim eyes", one has to wonder what, in the absence of any illustrations regarding science and mathematics, let alone rich ones, and in the face of hardly any history surrounding the introduction of the camels the reader is meant to expect from  that kind of description.

Nor is the reference to finding Mecca intended as a geographic exercise ("The geographic significance of Mecca"). In the
context of a sugar-coated introduction to Islam it becomes a politico-religious manipulation under the surface; as such it would achieve the same result no matter which way little Johnny points his finger.

Once again Dr Kindler's choice of words reveals the real motive behind this manual: "This resource is not a value-add to
Australian classrooms: it is an essential tool with which to address the requirements of a 21st century curriculum...". So LFOA is not meant as an additional text alongside so many others, but one that should replace current material in favour of its own brand of representation.

"Even the Islamic approach to sex and physical education and Sharia finance are explained" - another mellifluous wave of the hand to shoo in a subject matter without needing to disclose its sheer complexity.

Sentences such as "What I liked best about this part was the cross-curricular perspectives" and "This explores central questions of identity, citizenship, role models, peer pressure and the role of parents and communities" are yet more weasel words so beloved by top-heavy academics who are intent upon dressing up emptiness as substance; there is nothing in LFOA that has been "explored" beyond asimplistic touch here and there.

If the Federation of Australasian Philosophy in Schools Association [d] (of which Dr Kindler is a member) really
promotes teaching how to think in schools, then using "Learning from one another" as a desirable example represents an unsettling attempt at reconstructing the meaning of 'thinking', quite apart from the message the Department of Education & Training in Canberra must get from its Curriculum Support division.

Overall that review shows how a person's thought structures not only determine their perception of the world but also make them
choose their material to cultivate their own cognitive affinities.

The review is the product of a mutual admiration society willing to admit anyone who knows how to play the game of smiling nods.


References

a. Webster OnlineDictionary
b.
Webster OnlineDictionary
c.
Weasel Words
d.
FAPSA
 

Last Updated on Sunday, 04 July 2010 20:04  

AIM Listed by NLA

pandora

Australian Islamist Monitor's web publications were selected for preservation by the National Library of Australia. Access to our materials stored in the NLA Archive is facilitated in two ways: via the Library’s online catalogue; and via subject and title lists maintained on the PANDORA home page.
Click HERE for direct access to the archive

Islam Kills

History - Articles

Lest We Forget the Battle of Tours

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Australians celebrate and revere Anzac Day on April 25th each year in remembrance of our brave soldiers who fought in two great world wars to secure our freedom. Every Australian identifies with the slogan “lest we forget” and in services held around the country people reflect on the battles and men who died to secure our freedom. Yet across the world in France, there is one remarkable battle which helped form the Europe we know today and allowed the development of civilization based on Judeo Christian principles. This one famous battle has become known as the battle of Tours and effectively stopped the Muslim advance into Europe. After the death of Mohammed in 632AD, Muslim armies exploded out of the Arabian peninsula to conquer much of the Middle East, expanding across north Africa. From there they crossed into Spain in 711AD and eventually controlled much of al-Andalus by 715AD. It was the victory at Tours by Charles Martel that stemmed the tide and eventually the Muslim marauders were expelled from Spain in 1492 when the last outpost at Granada fell to King Ferdinand of Spain. 

Read more

Shivaji’s Coronation Laudatory Landmark

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Infidels' Resistance

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was born, lived, fought and won battles against religious and social oppression in the 17th century Bharat or India. He was a shining star in the Indian firmament and is renowned as a champion of the downtrodden and depressed masses. He was and continues to be an icon for the classes and masses alike and is seen as a rallying point for peasants oppressed by foreign rulers, Pathans and Moghuls alike. Sexually exploited women found in Shivaji Raje a protector, a benefactor and flocked to his Hindavi Swaraj to find solace and feel liberated under his saffron flag. 

Read more


Ransomer of Captives from the Muslims

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Perhaps some readers might be interested to know that January 28 is considered a feast day among Catholics – actually 2 feast days are celebrated on the same day – one is of ST Thomas Aquinas, the great medieval theologian and philosopher who adapted Aristotle to the western Judeo-Christian worldview. . It is also the feast day of a lesser known person – St Peter Nolasco, the great ransomer of captives from the Muslims.

Read more


Islamic Pirates

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Barbary Corsair
Somalian Islamic Pirates & Lessons from History
 
The dramatic rescue of the American cargo-ship captain Richard Phillips from the hands of Somalian Islamic pirates by the U.S. Navy—killing three pirates, holding him hostage at gun-point, through precision-targeting—warrants a review of the U.S. struggle with piracy and hostage-taking in North Africa, which ended two centuries ago.

Raiding trade-caravans and hostage-taking for extracting ransom in Islam was started by Prophet Muhammad. Having become powerful and secure after his relocation to Medina from Mecca in 622, Muhammad initiated Jihad or holy war in the form of raids of trade-caravans for earning livelihood for his community. In the first successful raid of a Meccan caravan at Nakhla in December 623, his brigands killed one of the attendants, took two of them captive, and acquired the caravan as “sacred” booty. The captives were ransomed to generate further revenue. Muhammad, later on, expanded this mode of Jihad to raiding non-Muslim communities around Arabia—for capturing their homes, properties and livestock, capturing their women and children as slaves often for ransoming and selling, and imposing extortional taxes—which sometimes involved mass-slaughter of the attacked victims.

Read more


The Battle of Broken Hill

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

Battle of Broken Hill Logo
 
The First Islamic Terrorist Attack on Australian Soil
 
On January 1, 1915 two Broken Hill men, both former camel drivers, armed themselves with rifles, an homemade flag bearing Islamic insignia and a large supply of ammunition and launched a surprise attack on the Picnic Train about 3 kilometres outside Broken Hill.

The train carried about 1200 Broken Hill residents to Silverton where a picnic to celebrate the new year was to take place.

The two Muslim men, Gool Mohamed originally a Pashtun tribesman from Afghanistan and Mullah Abdullah from what is known today as Pakistan, decided to wage jihad against Australian infidels after Australia and the Ottoman Empire officially joined the opposite sides in the WWI.

Read more


Jihad Galore

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Jihad Galore and the Toledo Whore

Battle of Higueruela

Alhambra - GazelleHow often in conversation with a Muslim, do they quote Spain as the crowning achievement of Islam, where Muslims, Jews and Christians lived in harmony for about 800 years?

And when you mention the killings and massacres, you are told that the Spanish Inquisition was much worse.
This is a misconception, since the Inquisition in Spain was responsible for only between 4,000 and 5,000 lives. [1]

Yet in 1066AD, in a single day, muslims murdered over 4,000 Jews because Vizier Joseph ibn Naghrela had risen to a position greater than them, and of course, this upset the Muslim sensitivities. [2]

Read more


Arabs Hated The Quran

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

 
How the Arabs Hated The Quran
 
Old Quran

Wh y are you a Muslim?
Musli ms in general love to hear the above question because it has a simple and readymade answer in their minds besides it gives them the opp or t u nity to propagate their religion and talk proudly about Islam.

 

Read more


Lepanto Anniversary

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Decisive Victory for the West

At this time of year, it is timely to remember one of the greatest victories of the west against the Islamic world. On the 7th October in 1571, Don Juan and the Holy League, led by Admiral Doria, defeated the larger Ottoman fleet in the Battle of Lepanto, saving Europe from the Turks and militant Islam. The Holy League was a coalition of different armies - of the Republic of Venice, the Papacy (under Pope Pius V), Spain (including Naples, Sicily and Sardinia), the Republic of Genoa, the Duchy of Savoy, the Knights Hospitaller and some others.

Read more


Muslim Jerusalem

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

Jerusalem - Coat of ArmsWhy do Muslims insist that Jerusalem is their Holy City?
When Mohamed and his faithful followers moved from Mecca to Medina, they found themselves among three Jewish tribes/clans (BANU-L-NADIR, BANU KAINUKA and BANU KURAIZA)  which settled there some time after their expulsion from their homeland and also living there were  two Arab, pagan tribes.

Mohammed, who at this stage needed more followers, decided to win those tribes over and convert them to his newly invented religion.

Islam was yet not as fully developed as we know it today, and Mohammed was still having his sessions with Allah (the Medina period revelations).

Read more


Killing of Banu Quraiza

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Did Prophet Muhammad order Killing Surrendered Jews of Banu Quraiza and Khaybar?  A historical Analysis

In the post 9/11 era of this modern-world, Islamists around the globe are busy with ‘damage control utopia’ in order to correct the image of religion Islam. We all know that the nucleus of Islam are: Quran, Hadiths (Sunnah) supported by Islamic histories and biographies recorded by various famous Islamic scholars and historians.

What Mecca?

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Early History

A great tragedy of the Islamic control of our universities and political correctness plus the fear of extreme violence if anyone dares question the roots and claims of Islam is ...that nobody dares question the roots and claims of Islam!!!  I want to stimulate interest and offer this summary of information on Mecca from (LINK) which discusses some problems with Muslim claims in a comparison of evidence supporting Islam/Christianity. 

Read more


Yahweh or Hubal

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

FlagThere is a very strongly entrenched view among majority of Westerners today that the three main monotheistic religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam share one common God and therefore despite the obvious differences, the core foundation of these three religions is the same. 

Read more