Australian Islamist Monitor

Islam Under Scrutiny

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

The Politics Behind Hijab

E-mail Print PDF

Mo & his chicksHijab as an Islamic icon

There is little doubt that hijab has become a symbol of Islam just like the crescent. The irony is that both of these two Islamic icons, which are widely believed to be Islamic, are in reality not parts of Islam. I do not want to spend much time discussing the origin of the crescent logo, but it certainly was not introduced or suggested by Mohammed or any of his successors, and there is no evidence that the later Islamic dynasties of the Omayyads and the Abbasids have used it. What matters now is that the crescent does symbolize Islam and that Muslims like it. It is there on top of every mosque and every minarat and in the centre of many flags of Islamic states.


The crescent may refer to Islam but it doesn’t say much about it, which explains its remarkable absence from the flag of Saudi Arabia. As we know, Saudi Arabia follows the teachings of Mohammed Ibn Abdul Wahhab (1703-1792), the founder of movement that carries his name, which put Islam back on track. The core of the teachings of Abdul Wahhab was to filter Islam from the impurities that gathered on it over the centuries and bring it to its original shape as Mohammed left it. Abdul Wahhab’s strategy was not to compromise because it’s only Allah he had to fear. He succeeded in bringing Islam back to form by removing all the impurities, which he called ‘dalala’. The Saudi flag is an honest expression of what the country and Islam stand for; to spread the word “no God but Allah, Mohammed is his messenger” by the sword.


Hijab and headscarves

The word Hijab is currently used to refer to the headscarf that covers the hair of a Muslim woman. In this article, both words will be used to refer to a woman’s head dress.  Until recently, many Middle Eastern Arabs used the word ‘Isharb’ as a name for women’s head dress, but that foreign name is rapidly becoming obsolete in favour of hijab.
     
Hijab
Hijab  means a total barrier between two things
 
Contrary to what most people think, hijab is a fairly recent introduction to the Muslims’ societies and started to gain popularity only in the 1990s. In fact the popularity of hijab in the Middle East came about so swiftly that the Arabs did were not sure which word to use to describe it. They had a selection of words including hijab, niquab, burqua, Khimar, and more. So it was left to the press, and it’s usually ignorant journalists, to make their choice. Of these words, the word


Hijab is a purely political issue

I do not want to bore the reader by discussing the sharia validation of hijab, or the lack of it, because this is NOT the issue. The important fact to know about hijab is that it is purely a political issue that is being advocated by the Muslim Brotherhood movement. The hijab to the Muslim brotherhood is like the red flag to the communists.

Our understanding of what the Quran and sunna say about women’s dress is irrelevant because what matters is what the Muslims and their scholars understand. There is no doubt that the vast majority of sunni Muslims and their scholars agree with the already established sharia rules regarding the Islamic dress code. That of course includes the Muslim Brotherhood scholars, the wahhabis and the Taliban.

 

Head to Toe
It is possible to argue that women should be covered from head to toe


The women’s dress code in Islam, just like anything else in Islam, is open to many interpretations. It is possible to argue that women dress can be anything, or almost anything, that appeals to the mind, and still be able to support the argument from the Quran and the sunna.

  •  It is possible to argue that women should be covered from head to toe, which in my opinion, is the honest and Laura Bushstraightforward understanding of Islam. This is the view of all devout Muslims who do not compromise to ‘appease’ their desires and wouldn’t change Islam to fit modernity but rather change modernity to fit Islam.
  • It is possible to argue that women are only allowed to show one or both eyes.
  • It is also possible to argue that women are under no obligation to wear any special Islamic dress. This is my favourite argument, which I often use to defend my position when I happen to be in a Muslim community. Some Muslims, even in the west, are rude enough to ask me (as a Muslim) why I do not ‘order’ my wife to wear hijab.
  • However, it is rather difficult to argue that women can expose their faces and cover their hair, there is nowhere in the Quran that says that! This Islamic fashion has no foundation in Islam and is prohibited under proper Islamic authorities like Saudi Arabia and Taliban.

Against all the odds, the headscarf has risen to become the most popular Islamic dress; it also assumed the name hijab even though it doesn’t describe it at all since the headscarf doesn’t form any barrier between a man and a woman.

The Muslim Brothers (ikhwan in Arabic) are happy with this widespread use of headscarves, even though in their writings and teachings they have a crystal clear vision of the Islamic dress which is no different from that of the wahhabis.

What makes the Muslim Brothers to be happy with the headscarf? Why are they happy with half measures?  
 
This Islamic irony is not unprecedented. In the past, the Muslim Brotherhood had accepted temporary solutions in hard times, just like their prophet did fourteen centuries ago. Accepting half measures is only a waiting tactic because as Muslims they still work hard to take all what they want.  This explains why the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood, from 1928 to the beginning of the Islamisation of Europe in the 1980s, and the female relatives of some of them, did not follow a proper Islamic dress code.

The Islamic Dress Code
 
According to sunni Islam, the entire body of a woman is considered ‘awra’, which is an Arabic word that refers to private parts that shouldn’t be seen by others. Therefore a Muslim woman should be completely covered with loose-fitting clothes to completely obscure the outline of the female body which can also be a source of sexual arousal. A woman’s voice is also considered as awra because it has the potential to cause sexual arousal; therefore women should be careful with their tone when they speak to men.
 
On the other hand, some scholars consider the genitalia to be the only part of the male body to be awra, but the general view is that men need to cover from the waist to the knees. Muslim men should grow beards, but not moustaches, and should wear garments that do not reach the ankles.
 
The above is the proper Islamic dress code, which will be forced on any society once the Islamists have control on that society. It is already applied in Saudi Arabia and the Taliban controlled areas.  
     

Muslim women’s dress before the hijab
 
Before the current hijab fashion, Muslim women (at least in the Middle Eastern countries) used to be covered to various degrees, on cultural rather than religious basis. In some societies women were covered from top to toe, while in others they just followed the latest western fashion. In general, women in cities were more likely to wear western clothes than women in rural areas, but that had nothing to do with degree of their adherence to Islam.
 
In the 1920s two important Islamic movemenAwrats appeared in the Middle East, the Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. The two groups have very similar understanding of Islam as evidenced from their teachings and writings; basically they were two sides of the same coin. However, each group had to adopt a completely different strategy that suited its own environment but without departing from the guidance of Mohammed’s sunna.
 
The Wahhabis were allies to the Saudi clan who managed to subjugate the entire Arabia by force. Spreading the Wahhabi Islamic teachings was straightforward; Arabia was simply forced to adopt the Wahhabi Islam. This is in sharp contrast with the situation in Egypt where the Muslim Brotherhood was founded in 1928. There were signs of secular trends in the Middle East, and Egypt was more open to the west than any other Middle Eastern country. The Muslim brotherhood had to work in a hostile environment because neither the government nor the people were in the mood to listen to them. Egypt to the Muslim Brotherhood was like Mecca to Mohammed; the leaders of the movement had to adopt a careful strategy similar to that of Mohammed’s when he was still in Mecca. On the other hand, Arabia to the Wahhabis was like Medina to Mohammed where he unleashes the full force of Islam against Arabia.
 
 
While still weak, the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy is to move slowly and carefully without upsetting the society by showing them the full picture of Islam. However, implementing the full Islamic sharia including the Islamic dress code has always been a central demand; they only needed to wait for the right time.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s demise of 1952-1970
 
The Muslim Brotherhood believes that the most practical way to implement sharia in a country is to take control that country, through jihad, and force the Islamic rule on its society. This is a well known Islamic strategy that worked well with Mohammed and his followers; the success of the Wahhabis in Arabia is a living a reminder.  The brotherhood movement had serious probl

ems with its chronic hunger for power, which lead the movement to infiltrate the army and government departments and to indulge in a series of political assassinations.
 
The Muslim Brotherhood’s dream nearly came true in 1952, when a group of army officers, some with sympathy to the Muslim Brotherhood, staged a military coup in Egypt. The leaders of the Muslim brotherhood approached the new leader, Gamal Abdul Nasser, offering him support if he applies the Islamic sharia; they specifically mentioned the Islamic dress. Nasser reportedly pointed out to them that their own daughters go to university uncovered, so why do they want all Egyptian women to be covered. Nasser, however, had different plans in mind and was too powerful to need their support. It became clear to the Muslim Brotherhood that the new leadership refuses to be influenced by them; therefore they reverted to their assassination policy. After a failed assassination attempt on Nasser, the Egyptian government responded by a crack down on the movement and imposed total ban on its activities.


How about this size
Decisions, decisions
 
Although banned in Egypt, the Muslim brotherhood was still active outside the country, thanks to the generous support from America and its friendly allies like Saudi Arabia. However, all that political and financial backing was no consolation to the Brotherhood movement, which remained helpless against the powerful Egyptian propaganda machine. Its members were branded, quite correctly, as terrorists who use religion to achieve their goals, and for nearly two decades, they failed to gain any significant popularity in the Middle East.


Resurgence of the Muslim Brotherhood
 
The political picture in the Middle East changed dramatically after Nasser’s death in 1970 and the appointment of Sadat as his successor. The new president allied his country with the America, and pursued a policy that was a virtual reversal of that of his predecessor. In an attempt to overpower the political groups that opposed his policies, Sadat lifted the ban on the Muslim Brotherhood, released their prisoners and encouraged the movement to go into action. The gates of heaven opened wide to the Muslim Brotherhood who, for the first time, enjoyed the backing of the governments of their home country, and other Middle Eastern countries, as well as America and the west. They wasted no time and took control of the mosques, the universities and the media. Lifting the lid on the Muslim brotherhood was probably one of the most doomed decisions of recent times. Sadat paid the price of his decision with his life when he was assassinated, by the Muslim Brotherhood, in 1981. Joining forces with their Wahhabi brothers, the Muslim brotherhood became an international force to reckon with; their evil activities spread in lightning speed claiming hundreds of thousands of lives. That was the beginning of the current wave of Islamic jihad that started, by the Muslim Brotherhood, in Afghanistan then moved to the Middle East causing civilian unrest in Syria 1981 then swept Algeria and Egypt in the early 1990s and the rest of the world since then.  Anwar Sadat
 
The Muslim Brotherhood seeks dominance through intimidation, just like Mohammed did fourteen centuries ago. They dominate the Muslims’ societies by using religion as a tool and intimidate the politicians by using the people in the streets as indicators for their influence and power. There is no better indication for the public support than the scenes of streets full with women with headscarves and men with beards. The current Islamic dress, although not yet properly Islamic, serves as a living opinion poll that sends a powerful message to the authorities.
 
The Muslim Brotherhood cannot rely on forcing men to grow beards because this is only a sunna (preferred) duty, but they can force women to wear hijab because it is a fard (obligatory). Unlike a full veil, a head scarf is a compromise that appeals to modern women and doesn’t cause resentment of those not so religious women or societies. The headscarf serves as an introductory hijab for Muslim women, who once put it on cannot take it off. In Egypt and the West Bank, women are virtually forced to wear the hijab by the aggressive advertisement in the streets and public transport depicting women who do not wear hijab as prostitutes.

Beyond Hijab
 
It is noticeable in Muslim countries that an increasing number of women who used to wear headscarves have upgraded to full veil. Those women were initially told they only needed to cover their hair to become good Muslims, which worked as the bait to enrol them to fundamental Islam and those after prayers lessons. They soon discover they are way behind in their religious duties and there is more to be done and more to be covered. Eventually, all women who live in an Islamic state will be asked to wear full body covers, willingly or by force, which is the stated plan of the Muslim Brotherhood.
 
The full veil has caused some antagonism from the public in western countries because of well justified security concerns. However, I think hijab poses even more threat to our national security than the veil because of its acceptance by the society. Most radical women, including those who carried out suicide bombing, only wear headscarves with no material veil. With such a mask of innocence and moderation that conceals her real intentions, a radical Muslim woman can infiltrate deeper into the society to unleash the evil of Islam.
 
The difference between a woman with a veil and a woman with a hijab is like the difference between an enemy in uniform and an enemy in disguise. The Muslims’ uniform is a thoub (a dress) and a beard for men and a full veil for women. The Muslims I fear most are those who are disguised in moderation because they are the darlings of the western governments, which select them to key positions. These eloquent and moderate looking Muslims can do immense damage to our societies, and their strength lies in their disguise.
 
Evolution
The difference between a woman with a veil and a woman with a hijab is like the difference between an enemy in uniform and an enemy in disguise.

 
Muslim women are often asked to wear hijab from a young age; of course they had no choice but are educated to believe that was their choice! In western societies, Muslim girls develop an image problem and become self conscious of their unusual dress. Muslims tend to be aggressive in propagating hijab; those girls who would rather not wear it fall under immense social and moral pressure, or rather intimidation, to do so. This is true even in western countries, where Muslims tend to live in Muslim neighbourhoods and socialise mainly with other Muslims. The Muslim brotherhood strategy in spreading hijab in small societies is the same they use in Muslim counties, which is to associate hijab with good conduct and bare hair with prostitution.  
 
There are Muslim women, who live in the west, and would rather not wear hijab at all. In theory, they have full rights to be able to make their choice but they are denied this basic human right. It is sad that nobody rises to defend the rights of those women, who are so intimidated that they cannot ask for help or express their free wishes.   

 

Last Updated on Thursday, 19 February 2009 05:22  

AIM Listed by NLA

pandora

Australian Islamist Monitor's web publications were selected for preservation by the National Library of Australia. Access to our materials stored in the NLA Archive is facilitated in two ways: via the Library’s online catalogue; and via subject and title lists maintained on the PANDORA home page.
Click HERE for direct access to the archive

Islam Kills

History - Articles

Lest We Forget the Battle of Tours

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Australians celebrate and revere Anzac Day on April 25th each year in remembrance of our brave soldiers who fought in two great world wars to secure our freedom. Every Australian identifies with the slogan “lest we forget” and in services held around the country people reflect on the battles and men who died to secure our freedom. Yet across the world in France, there is one remarkable battle which helped form the Europe we know today and allowed the development of civilization based on Judeo Christian principles. This one famous battle has become known as the battle of Tours and effectively stopped the Muslim advance into Europe. After the death of Mohammed in 632AD, Muslim armies exploded out of the Arabian peninsula to conquer much of the Middle East, expanding across north Africa. From there they crossed into Spain in 711AD and eventually controlled much of al-Andalus by 715AD. It was the victory at Tours by Charles Martel that stemmed the tide and eventually the Muslim marauders were expelled from Spain in 1492 when the last outpost at Granada fell to King Ferdinand of Spain. 

Read more

Shivaji’s Coronation Laudatory Landmark

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Infidels' Resistance

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was born, lived, fought and won battles against religious and social oppression in the 17th century Bharat or India. He was a shining star in the Indian firmament and is renowned as a champion of the downtrodden and depressed masses. He was and continues to be an icon for the classes and masses alike and is seen as a rallying point for peasants oppressed by foreign rulers, Pathans and Moghuls alike. Sexually exploited women found in Shivaji Raje a protector, a benefactor and flocked to his Hindavi Swaraj to find solace and feel liberated under his saffron flag. 

Read more


Ransomer of Captives from the Muslims

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Perhaps some readers might be interested to know that January 28 is considered a feast day among Catholics – actually 2 feast days are celebrated on the same day – one is of ST Thomas Aquinas, the great medieval theologian and philosopher who adapted Aristotle to the western Judeo-Christian worldview. . It is also the feast day of a lesser known person – St Peter Nolasco, the great ransomer of captives from the Muslims.

Read more


Islamic Pirates

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Barbary Corsair
Somalian Islamic Pirates & Lessons from History
 
The dramatic rescue of the American cargo-ship captain Richard Phillips from the hands of Somalian Islamic pirates by the U.S. Navy—killing three pirates, holding him hostage at gun-point, through precision-targeting—warrants a review of the U.S. struggle with piracy and hostage-taking in North Africa, which ended two centuries ago.

Raiding trade-caravans and hostage-taking for extracting ransom in Islam was started by Prophet Muhammad. Having become powerful and secure after his relocation to Medina from Mecca in 622, Muhammad initiated Jihad or holy war in the form of raids of trade-caravans for earning livelihood for his community. In the first successful raid of a Meccan caravan at Nakhla in December 623, his brigands killed one of the attendants, took two of them captive, and acquired the caravan as “sacred” booty. The captives were ransomed to generate further revenue. Muhammad, later on, expanded this mode of Jihad to raiding non-Muslim communities around Arabia—for capturing their homes, properties and livestock, capturing their women and children as slaves often for ransoming and selling, and imposing extortional taxes—which sometimes involved mass-slaughter of the attacked victims.

Read more


The Battle of Broken Hill

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

Battle of Broken Hill Logo
 
The First Islamic Terrorist Attack on Australian Soil
 
On January 1, 1915 two Broken Hill men, both former camel drivers, armed themselves with rifles, an homemade flag bearing Islamic insignia and a large supply of ammunition and launched a surprise attack on the Picnic Train about 3 kilometres outside Broken Hill.

The train carried about 1200 Broken Hill residents to Silverton where a picnic to celebrate the new year was to take place.

The two Muslim men, Gool Mohamed originally a Pashtun tribesman from Afghanistan and Mullah Abdullah from what is known today as Pakistan, decided to wage jihad against Australian infidels after Australia and the Ottoman Empire officially joined the opposite sides in the WWI.

Read more


Jihad Galore

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Jihad Galore and the Toledo Whore

Battle of Higueruela

Alhambra - GazelleHow often in conversation with a Muslim, do they quote Spain as the crowning achievement of Islam, where Muslims, Jews and Christians lived in harmony for about 800 years?

And when you mention the killings and massacres, you are told that the Spanish Inquisition was much worse.
This is a misconception, since the Inquisition in Spain was responsible for only between 4,000 and 5,000 lives. [1]

Yet in 1066AD, in a single day, muslims murdered over 4,000 Jews because Vizier Joseph ibn Naghrela had risen to a position greater than them, and of course, this upset the Muslim sensitivities. [2]

Read more


Arabs Hated The Quran

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

 
How the Arabs Hated The Quran
 
Old Quran

Wh y are you a Muslim?
Musli ms in general love to hear the above question because it has a simple and readymade answer in their minds besides it gives them the opp or t u nity to propagate their religion and talk proudly about Islam.

 

Read more


Lepanto Anniversary

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Decisive Victory for the West

At this time of year, it is timely to remember one of the greatest victories of the west against the Islamic world. On the 7th October in 1571, Don Juan and the Holy League, led by Admiral Doria, defeated the larger Ottoman fleet in the Battle of Lepanto, saving Europe from the Turks and militant Islam. The Holy League was a coalition of different armies - of the Republic of Venice, the Papacy (under Pope Pius V), Spain (including Naples, Sicily and Sardinia), the Republic of Genoa, the Duchy of Savoy, the Knights Hospitaller and some others.

Read more


Muslim Jerusalem

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

Jerusalem - Coat of ArmsWhy do Muslims insist that Jerusalem is their Holy City?
When Mohamed and his faithful followers moved from Mecca to Medina, they found themselves among three Jewish tribes/clans (BANU-L-NADIR, BANU KAINUKA and BANU KURAIZA)  which settled there some time after their expulsion from their homeland and also living there were  two Arab, pagan tribes.

Mohammed, who at this stage needed more followers, decided to win those tribes over and convert them to his newly invented religion.

Islam was yet not as fully developed as we know it today, and Mohammed was still having his sessions with Allah (the Medina period revelations).

Read more


Killing of Banu Quraiza

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Did Prophet Muhammad order Killing Surrendered Jews of Banu Quraiza and Khaybar?  A historical Analysis

In the post 9/11 era of this modern-world, Islamists around the globe are busy with ‘damage control utopia’ in order to correct the image of religion Islam. We all know that the nucleus of Islam are: Quran, Hadiths (Sunnah) supported by Islamic histories and biographies recorded by various famous Islamic scholars and historians.

What Mecca?

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Early History

A great tragedy of the Islamic control of our universities and political correctness plus the fear of extreme violence if anyone dares question the roots and claims of Islam is ...that nobody dares question the roots and claims of Islam!!!  I want to stimulate interest and offer this summary of information on Mecca from (LINK) which discusses some problems with Muslim claims in a comparison of evidence supporting Islam/Christianity. 

Read more


Yahweh or Hubal

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

FlagThere is a very strongly entrenched view among majority of Westerners today that the three main monotheistic religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam share one common God and therefore despite the obvious differences, the core foundation of these three religions is the same. 

Read more