Australian Islamist Monitor

Islam Under Scrutiny

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Is There a Conspiracy?

E-mail Print PDF
They need counselingAlthough conspiracies exist in all societies, but the conspiracy theories are often convenient inventions by those people who do not have the courage to admit their mistakes or face their failure where all the blame is thrown on the others. The conspiracy theories are usually comfortable retreats for the minds of those people who are unhappy about their misfortunes, or those who cannot come to terms with their own under achievements. This world of conspiracies is the favourite resort for the tired minds of the Muslims who are never happy in the real world and would rather be in a world of fantasy which they shape in their own imagination and to their own satisfaction.
 
The Islamic threat to our civilization is real; the Muslim terrorists proved many times their extraordinary capabilities to take terrorism to previously unknown frontiers. As a former Muslim I can explain the Muslims’ motivations to destroy our civilization, because I know the Muslims’ mindset and how Islam halts its followers’ abilities of rational reasoning. However, I find it difficult to understand the endless western apathy towards such an obvious menace. I am not normally a fan of the conspiracy theories, but I am afraid that my inability to explain the western determination to cave in to Islam is pushing me to ask some inevitable questions: Is it conceivable that the western nations, who lead the world in science and technology, can miss such an obvious danger to all what they stand for?  Is it conceivable that the western nations have reached a stage where they cannot tell the right from the wrong on simple matters? Or is there a well planned policy to subjugate Europe and the rest of the western world?  
 
Muslims in Western Countries
A recent report from the British government says that 1 in 11 British Muslims proactively support terrorism (1). Breeding terrorists
It is ridiculous that the western governments still believe in such surveys about the Muslims allegiance despite the well known and thoroughly discussed principle of taqiya. When Muslims are asked a question about an issue as sensitive as the above, they simply do not express their real feelings. I am also surprised that some Muslims have the courage to admit their support to terrorism, which reflects the Muslims’ rising confidence, thanks to the protection and support of some western groups and laws.
 
There are dozens of millions of Muslims who live in the western countries. The more radical they are, the more likely they are unemployed and live on the system’s benefits, which gives them a much needed time to dedicate all their energy to plan for and carry out the destruction of their host countries. The real number of the Muslims who support terrorism must be many times higher than the above survey suggests. But let us assume that the survey is correct and that the vast majority of Muslims are good and innocent people. The westerners believe that it is unfair and uncivilised to condemn all Muslims because of the actions of a few.
 
Let us put this logical problem in a different way:
A dozen of people are visiting your house, but you realise that one of them, you are not sure which one, plans to kill some members of your family.
Q. would you let them stay in your house?
The obvious answer is NO, but this is not so obvious to the western countries who believe they should let them all in because they are mostly innocents!

Guantanamo

In what appears to me like an incentive to Muslim terrorists, Barak Obama’s first priority in office was to order the shutdown of Guantanamo detention camp. At the same time, Obama signed another executive order designed to increase the rights of enemy combatants, and made plans to strengthen federal hate crimes legislation and expand hate crimes protection. When measures like these become the head of state’s top priority one cannot help wondering if this is really a war on terror or invitation to terror.
 
None of the inmates in Guantanamo was captured while on holiday in Afghanistan, they were all armed, dangerous and dedicated extremists fighting alongside the Taliban. They are the kind of people who, given the chance, would carry out atrocities similar or worse to the ones that took place in Beslan, Madrid or London. They are not innocents and it is difficult to understand the international criticism and pressure in defence of those terrorists’ ‘rights’, whose mission is to take away the innocents’ rights and lives.
 
Fast asleep
 
 
Some of the Guantanamo terrorists were released and over half of them rejoined their terror groups to continue their divine career of terrorising and killing.
 
The uproar about the Guantanamo is too insane to be just a mistake. It is disgraceful that the people who campaign for the release of those terrorists are doing absolutely nothing about the tens of thousands of political prisoners in the Muslims’ countries.  Releasing the terrorists from their detention camps is simply too wrong, it is like arming your enemy with lethal weapons!   

The Internet

Muslims made no contributions whatsoever to the development of satellite technology, electronics and computers. These are all scientific achievements of the infidels; the Muslims’ only contribution is to use, or rather abuse, them. One would expect that these technological tools Muslim hacking signaturewould be effectively used by the western nations, who invented them, to protect their civilization. Just imagine that it is the Gulf Arabs, not America, who are at the top of the world in all the scientific and industrial fields. Had the Gulf Arabs been in charge of all this technology, they would never allow the infidels to have good access it. They already do not allow any foreigners, even other Arabs, to settle and become citizens for the fear of sharing their wealth.  
 
The Middle Eastern countries banned all websites that criticise Islam; they use the western technology to kill freedom of expression, which is a treasured western value. The Islamists, however, have taken this a step too far; they terrorise the internet community by hacking any website that dares to criticise Islam. This war against terrorism and Islam is increasingly becoming an information war. Why the infidels, who introduced and run anything to do with technology, do not restrict the terrorists’ access to this valuable tool?
 
Osama Bin Laden and his followers are on the run, they live in caves or mud huts with primitive access to technology. However, whenever Bin Laden releases a video through Aljazeera, that video makes the headlines in all news channels around the world. When the terrorist speaks the whole world listens! No other head of state enjoys such a privilege. During the last conflict in Gaza, the entire guilty leadership of Hamas went underground. The Hamas radio was only temporarily silenced and was on the air most of the time. Immediately after the cease fire, Hamas leaders declared victory through Aljazeera TV. If Aljazeera can find those most wanted leaders of terror, why can’t the Americans and the Israelis, with all that technology at their disposal?   

The Main Stream Media

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference, and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers"
 
Obviously this is about ‘controversial speech’. All the free speech laws were introduced to protect controversial and offensive speech. Straight forward speech or views are not at risk and need no protection.MSM
It is generally accepted that the principle of freedom of expression is one of the most treasured human values. The western press gained a reputation of fiercely guarding its right of freedom of expression and to have no hesitation to confront whoever dares to influence that treasured right.

If the main stream media is so obsessed with freedom of expression, what makes them accept what is virtually an Islamic censorship on any open discussion of Islam? With all the Islamic terrorism around us, why are we not allowed to see in Islam anything but peace and tolerance? Reuters openly admitted that, when reporting on Islam, their main concern is to protect their reporters, which, unfortunately, means that terror pays and makes us wonder if Reuters is in the right job (2). CNN, on the other hand, admitted that, during Saddam’s rule, it has systematically covered up stories of Iraqi atrocities and suppressed reports of murder, torture, and assassinations in order to maintain its Baghdad bureau(3).

A substantial proportion of the difficulties and setbacks of the war on terror were cause by the western media which seems to function as the self destruct button of the western civilization. The western media worked hard to cast doubt about the existence of Islamic terrorism in the first place, they even joined the fantasy world in claiming that 9/11 attacks were an insiders’ work. They deliberately misinformed their audience by covering up the grave atrocities of Saddam’s regime.  While the American soldiers were risking their lives in Iraq, their national media were not interested in reporting their courage and military successes, but rather busy looking for their shortcomings. The disgraceful Abu Ghraib scandal brought shame to all the personnel who were involved in it who were all put on trial. The western media projected the scandal as if it was a standard American strategy. The sexual nature of the scandal hit a chord among the Arabs, even those who initially considered the war to be a liberation war, but later lost faith completely in the professionalism of the American military.
 
The western media still insist that we cannot blame the Muslims in general because of the actions of a few terrorists. On the other hand the same media was happy to blame the entire American Army and government for the actions of some corrupt personnel.  In the UK, the British media were not fortunate enough to be able to report a real British Army scandal similar to Abu Ghraib, so they made up one! The Mirror newspaper, which opposed the war, was not ashamed to report in May 2004 a fake scandal about the British army to support its agenda (4).  
 
The Unfair Justice

A few weeks ago, the Dutch government decided to prosecute Geert Wilders for producing his film ‘Fitna’ which is claimed to spread hate. I watched the twelve minutes film; it is about quotations from the Quran that are echoed in speeches made by some Muslims and some scenes of practical applications of those verses. The film depicts the true Islam, indeed some true and honest Muslims, like ‘Omar Bakri’, praised the film and said it could be used by their organizations. However, the Dutch government doesn’t want its people to see what the true Islam has in store for them. The Dutch government, like other western governments, practices ‘taqiya’ by covering up the problem for fear that their people wake up early and do something about it.
 
Hate Criminals
What do Bouyeri and Wilders have in common? Oh, apparently both are involved in "hate crime".

 
In a similar incident, channel 4, the British television channel, produced a programme called ‘undercover mosque’ that included video recordings of some hateful speeches made by leading Muslim clerics in the UK. The Muslims who appeared in the video recordings did not deny the authenticity of what was shown on television and did not apologise for it. The speeches made by the Muslim clerics were hateful and profoundly shocking that the British police had to interfere, not to arrest those who made them but to take channel 4 to court for showing the programme!

Incidents like the above are becoming a normal pattern where the authorities’ top priority is to appease Muslims. The Muslims’ communities do not need to put any more pressure on the western governments to cave in to their demands. The west has reached a stage where the authorities think ahead and take action before the Muslims even notice it!



References:

1. One in 11 British Muslims backs suicide bombers, says Brown aide
2. “ My goal is to protect our reporters and protect our editorial integrity” Reuters' global managing editor said. The New York Times
3.CNN: In a shocking New York Times opinion piece, CNN's chief news executive Eason Jordan has admitted that for the past decade the network has systematically covered up stories of Iraqi atrocities. Reports of murder, torture, and planned assassinations were suppressed in order to maintain CNN's Baghdad bureau. (LINK)
4. “Doubts were cast over the weekend about photos published in Saturday's Mirror” (LINK)
Last Updated on Sunday, 08 February 2009 13:25  

AIM Listed by NLA

pandora

Australian Islamist Monitor's web publications were selected for preservation by the National Library of Australia. Access to our materials stored in the NLA Archive is facilitated in two ways: via the Library’s online catalogue; and via subject and title lists maintained on the PANDORA home page.
Click HERE for direct access to the archive

Islam Kills

History - Articles

Lest We Forget the Battle of Tours

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Australians celebrate and revere Anzac Day on April 25th each year in remembrance of our brave soldiers who fought in two great world wars to secure our freedom. Every Australian identifies with the slogan “lest we forget” and in services held around the country people reflect on the battles and men who died to secure our freedom. Yet across the world in France, there is one remarkable battle which helped form the Europe we know today and allowed the development of civilization based on Judeo Christian principles. This one famous battle has become known as the battle of Tours and effectively stopped the Muslim advance into Europe. After the death of Mohammed in 632AD, Muslim armies exploded out of the Arabian peninsula to conquer much of the Middle East, expanding across north Africa. From there they crossed into Spain in 711AD and eventually controlled much of al-Andalus by 715AD. It was the victory at Tours by Charles Martel that stemmed the tide and eventually the Muslim marauders were expelled from Spain in 1492 when the last outpost at Granada fell to King Ferdinand of Spain. 

Read more

Shivaji’s Coronation Laudatory Landmark

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Infidels' Resistance

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was born, lived, fought and won battles against religious and social oppression in the 17th century Bharat or India. He was a shining star in the Indian firmament and is renowned as a champion of the downtrodden and depressed masses. He was and continues to be an icon for the classes and masses alike and is seen as a rallying point for peasants oppressed by foreign rulers, Pathans and Moghuls alike. Sexually exploited women found in Shivaji Raje a protector, a benefactor and flocked to his Hindavi Swaraj to find solace and feel liberated under his saffron flag. 

Read more


Ransomer of Captives from the Muslims

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Perhaps some readers might be interested to know that January 28 is considered a feast day among Catholics – actually 2 feast days are celebrated on the same day – one is of ST Thomas Aquinas, the great medieval theologian and philosopher who adapted Aristotle to the western Judeo-Christian worldview. . It is also the feast day of a lesser known person – St Peter Nolasco, the great ransomer of captives from the Muslims.

Read more


Islamic Pirates

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Barbary Corsair
Somalian Islamic Pirates & Lessons from History
 
The dramatic rescue of the American cargo-ship captain Richard Phillips from the hands of Somalian Islamic pirates by the U.S. Navy—killing three pirates, holding him hostage at gun-point, through precision-targeting—warrants a review of the U.S. struggle with piracy and hostage-taking in North Africa, which ended two centuries ago.

Raiding trade-caravans and hostage-taking for extracting ransom in Islam was started by Prophet Muhammad. Having become powerful and secure after his relocation to Medina from Mecca in 622, Muhammad initiated Jihad or holy war in the form of raids of trade-caravans for earning livelihood for his community. In the first successful raid of a Meccan caravan at Nakhla in December 623, his brigands killed one of the attendants, took two of them captive, and acquired the caravan as “sacred” booty. The captives were ransomed to generate further revenue. Muhammad, later on, expanded this mode of Jihad to raiding non-Muslim communities around Arabia—for capturing their homes, properties and livestock, capturing their women and children as slaves often for ransoming and selling, and imposing extortional taxes—which sometimes involved mass-slaughter of the attacked victims.

Read more


The Battle of Broken Hill

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

Battle of Broken Hill Logo
 
The First Islamic Terrorist Attack on Australian Soil
 
On January 1, 1915 two Broken Hill men, both former camel drivers, armed themselves with rifles, an homemade flag bearing Islamic insignia and a large supply of ammunition and launched a surprise attack on the Picnic Train about 3 kilometres outside Broken Hill.

The train carried about 1200 Broken Hill residents to Silverton where a picnic to celebrate the new year was to take place.

The two Muslim men, Gool Mohamed originally a Pashtun tribesman from Afghanistan and Mullah Abdullah from what is known today as Pakistan, decided to wage jihad against Australian infidels after Australia and the Ottoman Empire officially joined the opposite sides in the WWI.

Read more


Jihad Galore

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Jihad Galore and the Toledo Whore

Battle of Higueruela

Alhambra - GazelleHow often in conversation with a Muslim, do they quote Spain as the crowning achievement of Islam, where Muslims, Jews and Christians lived in harmony for about 800 years?

And when you mention the killings and massacres, you are told that the Spanish Inquisition was much worse.
This is a misconception, since the Inquisition in Spain was responsible for only between 4,000 and 5,000 lives. [1]

Yet in 1066AD, in a single day, muslims murdered over 4,000 Jews because Vizier Joseph ibn Naghrela had risen to a position greater than them, and of course, this upset the Muslim sensitivities. [2]

Read more


Arabs Hated The Quran

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

 
How the Arabs Hated The Quran
 
Old Quran

Wh y are you a Muslim?
Musli ms in general love to hear the above question because it has a simple and readymade answer in their minds besides it gives them the opp or t u nity to propagate their religion and talk proudly about Islam.

 

Read more


Lepanto Anniversary

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Decisive Victory for the West

At this time of year, it is timely to remember one of the greatest victories of the west against the Islamic world. On the 7th October in 1571, Don Juan and the Holy League, led by Admiral Doria, defeated the larger Ottoman fleet in the Battle of Lepanto, saving Europe from the Turks and militant Islam. The Holy League was a coalition of different armies - of the Republic of Venice, the Papacy (under Pope Pius V), Spain (including Naples, Sicily and Sardinia), the Republic of Genoa, the Duchy of Savoy, the Knights Hospitaller and some others.

Read more


Muslim Jerusalem

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

Jerusalem - Coat of ArmsWhy do Muslims insist that Jerusalem is their Holy City?
When Mohamed and his faithful followers moved from Mecca to Medina, they found themselves among three Jewish tribes/clans (BANU-L-NADIR, BANU KAINUKA and BANU KURAIZA)  which settled there some time after their expulsion from their homeland and also living there were  two Arab, pagan tribes.

Mohammed, who at this stage needed more followers, decided to win those tribes over and convert them to his newly invented religion.

Islam was yet not as fully developed as we know it today, and Mohammed was still having his sessions with Allah (the Medina period revelations).

Read more


Killing of Banu Quraiza

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Did Prophet Muhammad order Killing Surrendered Jews of Banu Quraiza and Khaybar?  A historical Analysis

In the post 9/11 era of this modern-world, Islamists around the globe are busy with ‘damage control utopia’ in order to correct the image of religion Islam. We all know that the nucleus of Islam are: Quran, Hadiths (Sunnah) supported by Islamic histories and biographies recorded by various famous Islamic scholars and historians.

What Mecca?

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Early History

A great tragedy of the Islamic control of our universities and political correctness plus the fear of extreme violence if anyone dares question the roots and claims of Islam is ...that nobody dares question the roots and claims of Islam!!!  I want to stimulate interest and offer this summary of information on Mecca from (LINK) which discusses some problems with Muslim claims in a comparison of evidence supporting Islam/Christianity. 

Read more


Yahweh or Hubal

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

FlagThere is a very strongly entrenched view among majority of Westerners today that the three main monotheistic religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam share one common God and therefore despite the obvious differences, the core foundation of these three religions is the same. 

Read more