Australian Islamist Monitor

Islam Under Scrutiny

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Truth is a crime: Geert Wilders

E-mail Print PDF
Darkness over AmsterdamThe lights are going out across Europe as Islamic barbarity and repression spread across the land.   Such a spread of course requires not just massive immigration, high birth rates, a refusal to assimilate, violence, threats and demands from the invaders but also complicity at the highest levels.   
It is only through such complicity that we could find “One of the supposedly most liberal societies on the planet wants to criminalise someone for telling the truth”(a) or find that Holland has gone from “a beacon of enlightened liberal values to the leading edge of the NEW TOTALITARIANISM in just a few short years thanks to the influence of Islam”(h)


According to Pat Condell, the Dutch government is  “so determined to prostrate their country towards Mecca that insulting Islam is now officially a criminal offense.”  He notes that “if I talked about Muslims the way their ‘holy book’ talks about me, I’d be arrested for hate speech ...” he also notes that “whenever we hear the words human rights in connection with Islam we’re about to be confronted with another piece of ugly opportunism that spits in the face of genuine human rights and insults everyone’s intelligence..”... “nobody should be compelled to respect an ideology that doesn’t respect them and Islam respects no-body. It claims dominion..you submit.”

The charges:
The Amsterdam Court of Appeal 21/1/09 ordered the criminal prosecution of the Member of Parliament of the Dutch Second Chamber Geert Wilders.   Wilders is charged with incitement to hatred and discrimination for comments about Muslim beliefs and insulting Muslims by comparisons re Islam and Nazism.

The Court of Appeal acted after complaints when the public prosecutor decided NOT to act.
“The public prosecution is of the view, amongst others, that part of the statements of Wilders do not relate to a group of worshippers, but consists of criticism as regards the Islamic belief, as a result of which neither the self-esteem of this group of worshippers is affected nor is this group brought into discredit. Some statements of Wilders can be regarded as offending, but since these were made (outside the Dutch Second Chamber) as a contribution to a social debate there is nolonger a ground for punishableness of those statements according to the public prosecution.”

One can read the reasons claimed by the court of appeal (c) but one can only wonder at their ‘reasoning’ as Wilders in his film fitna simply stated Islamic text, and showed Muslims preaching and carrying out the instructions in their text and Mohammad’s example and the connection between Islam and Hitler/Nazism is well known.  

Complicity?
Of course Islamists and their enablers across Europe will see this as a precedent to shutting down any ‘free speech’ that criticises Islam.   
We must ask-Is Wilders and his ‘truth about Islam’ becoming too popular?   60% of Dutch people believe Islam is a threat to their culture/national identity.(h)
What is the involvement of Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende and Minister of Justice Hirsh Ballin of the Dutch ‘left’ who fear Wilders increasing power and depend on the Islamic vote?
Is it true that PvdA (Labour) MP Els Lucas tried but failed to have the public prosecutor prosecute Wilders so appealed to the Amsterdam Geert Wildersappellate court?

 Condell notes the:
 “dhimmi judges of Amsterdam to whom the politics of appeasement are clearly more important than justice.  SHAME on them and what kind of justice system is it where the TRUTH is INADMISSABLE as EVIDENCE!” He states that those in power must “either continue with this toxic multicultural lie indefinitely or admit to a catastrophic mistake in opening the floodgates to Islam..”  The “multicultural mafia/Gestapo who try to pass laws and harass people but people have had enough.” “We are not going to respect Islam until Islam starts to respect us but then if that ever happened, it wouldn’t be Islam anymore!”(h)

Fitna:
Fitna shows Muslim demonstrators with placards stating:
‘God bless Hitler’ and ‘Freedom go to hell.’ It shows “a war of religion with striking similarities to Nazi ideology and murderous mass hysteria. Omar Bakri, the Libyan-based radical Muslim cleric who is barred from Britain, did not think the film was very offensive. ‘On the contrary, if we leave out the first images and the sound of the page being torn, it could be a film by the [Islamist] Mujahideen,’ he said.” (a)

Wilder’s film and Charlie Chaplain’s anti-Nazi fascism film The Great Dictator share similarities.  Both relate to rising fascism/totalitarianism;   genocide of certain groups particularly the Jews;   racial supremacy (Arians/ white Arabs);   both were produced at a time of public lethargy, disinterest and denial of the problem;   both faced objections from the same people—and faced government censorship, threats and demands to appease Hitler/Islam;   German sympathisers in the US threatened stink bombs, Muslims threaten with real bombs;   both challenged political correctness;   both films were banned in various countries including some about to suffer German attacks…and many countries today suffer increasing Islamic attacks:  (b, e,)  The appalling efforts by the Dutch government, UN, EU, others  to stop Fitna  are detailed in (k)
‘It was treason to our Western principles, it was treason to freedom of speech, it was treason to liberty itself. My own government was not defending me, but became my worst enemy in the process’ -Wilders. (k)
Both films warn of a coming horror that could be prevented if we opened our eyes and acted against these ideologies.  Have we nothing to learn?   Will history repeat itself with millions dead or subjugated?  Will some roll-over as they did for Hitler and hand over their Jews, gays, gypsies,..Muslim critics, infidels as Holland has already done!

Islam, Hitler, Nazism:
My Struggle - My JihadMany thinkers, philosophers, presidents, prime Ministers etc over centuries have expressed horror at Islam’s text.  Winston Churchill who clearly identified the Nazi threat also clearly identified the Islamic threat  (see The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-50, London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1899 quoted in ‘Europe; Arabic one day, Islamic the next’  by Geoff Dickson 29/1/09 this site or (a).

Churchill likened Islamic terrorism to Nazism :
“In truth though, just as the British stoicism recalls the same from 65 years ago, so too, there is a deep and instructive similarity between the Nazis and the Islamic-fascist forces that attacked then and attack today. The fact of the matter is that even more important than invoking the famous British “stiff upper lip,” to fight this current war to victory requires understanding and accepting the similarities between the Nazis and the Arab-Islamic terrorist armies.”(a)

Churhill  and Hitler shared the same view about Islam (totalitarian, violent) but Churchill denounced it and Hitler loved it!

Hitler learns the Islamic ideals of jihad and world domination:
There is a wealth of evidence supporting the ideological similarity between Islam and Nazism and photographs showing the close ties between Muslims and Nazis.  Hitler read the work (Tazkirah) of  Indian Muslim separatist Mashriqi and met him in 1926 in the Berlin National Library where their discussion included a detailed discussion of Islamic jihad.     Mashriqi espoused the demand that Islam conquer and dominate the world, making others subservient.  He noted that most of the Koran is concerned with conquest/jihad and related themes and the requirement that Muslims fight for Islam Jihad bi-l-saif (“jihad with the sword”).  The 10 principles in the Mashriqi’s Tazkirah, read by Hitler and discussed in 1926, enshrined the quintessential message of Islam, the ideals of militaristic nation building and “This vision sounded almost identical to sections of Hitler’s Mein Kampf (compare to Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, pp. 169-179, Reynal and Hitchcock trans, 1941)” In 1930, Mashriqi sent Hitler his Ishara (d)

Mashriqi stated: 
“The astonishing similarities—or shall we say the unintentional similarity between two great minds—between Hitler’s great book and the teachings of my Tazkirah and Isharat embolden me,...... But only after leading his nation to the intended goal, has he disclosed his movement’s rules and obligations to the world; only after fifteen years has he made the means of success widely known. It is possible that he has arrived at those means and doctrines by trial and error, but it should be absolutely clear that Mashriqi [referring to himself in the third person] has identified those means and doctrines in al-Tazkirah a full nine years and in the Isharat a full three years before the success of the Nazi movement, simply by following the shining guidance of the Holy Koran.(d)

Bostom quotes Albert Speer, Hitler’s Minister of Armaments and War Production, which recount Hitler’s effusive praise for Islam, along with his racist attitudes to Arabs:
Hitler had been much impressed by a scrap of history he had learned from a delegation of distinguished Arabs. When the Mohammedans attempted to penetrate beyond France into Central Europe during the eighth century, his visitors had told him, they had been driven back at the Battle of Tours. Had the Arabs won this battle, the world would be Mohammedan today. For theirs was a religion that believed in spreading the faith by the sword and subjugating all nations to that faith. Such a creed was perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament. Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire. Hitler usually concluded this historical speculation by remarking, “You see, it’s been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn’t we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?(i, d)
Hitler with Mufti

 Bostom notes:
“These sentiments were also expressed by Hitler to Dr. Herman Neubacher, the first Nazi Mayor of Vienna, and subsequently, a special delegate of the Nazi regime in southeastern Europe. Neubacher wrote that Hitler had told him Islam was a “male religion,” and reiterated the belief that the Germans would have been far more successful conquerors had they adopted Islam in the Middle Ages. Additional confirmation of Hitler’s very favorable inclination towards Islam is provided by General Alexander Loehr, a Lutwaffe commander (executed in 1947 for the mass-murders of Yugoslav civilians). Loehr maintained a smiling Hitler had told him that Islam was such a desirable creed the Fuehrer longed for it to become the official SS religion “(d).
Hitler seemed to regard Islam’s jihad as a good model for genocidal war.
Hitler noted the Ottoman’s total genocide of the Armenians and stated:   
 “Who after all is today speaking of the destruction of the Armenians?,”     He emphasized the urgent task, “of protecting the German blood from contamination, not only of the Jewish but also of the Armenian blood.”   Both groups were ‘vulnerable.’(d)

Nazism and Islam shared a hatred of Jews ...and others!  They also share ideas of world domination via military action/jihad, racial superiority, genocide of others, and extreme centralised, totalitarian control (Fuehrer/caliph) that reaches deeply into every life.

Hitler, Jerusalem’s Mufti and European Muslim Nazis:

Long before Israel was formed, Turks and Arabs formented ‘holy war’ against Jews. Hajj Amin el-Husseini (mufti of Jerusalem) via jihad/riots enforced dhimmitude on Jews.  As Nazi Germany rose in 1930/40s the mufti increased anti-Jewish behaviour to gain Hitler’s (Bosnian Muslim, Arab) support to annihilate Jews.  The Mufti headed to Germany after causing a Jewish massacre in Baghdad 1941and gave radio broadcasts saying to “Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history, and religion.”


Several historians report that meetings between the Mufti and Hitler in 1941 and 1942 led to an understanding whereby Hitler's forces would invade Palestine to slaughter the roughly 500,000 Jews in Palestine.  Rommel’s defeat by Montgomery at El Alamein, Egypt, in October/November 1942 finished the plan.

Nazi leader Himmler stated:
“Muslims responded to the call of Muslim leaders and joined our side because of their hatred of our joint Jewish-English-Bolshevik enemies, and because of their belief and respect for, above all — Our Fuehrer.”(a)

Himmler, head of the SS (Nazi Secret Police) and all German police forces, guided establishment of a Waffen-SS 13th (later dubbed Handzar) Division - comprised exclusively of Muslims from Bosnia and Herzegovina. He tried setting up a ‘janissary’ division taking children from surrounding populations and forcing them to train as fighters for Hitler following the Ottoman example (Janissaries-military slaves taken from the families of the subjugated Christian populations while children/ adolescents, and forcibly converted to Islam, as part of the Ottoman devshirme levy system)(d)

In Europe the Bosnian Muslim Handzar SS Division destroyed Bosnian Jewish and Serbian communities, massacred Jews and Serbs, and deported survivors to Auschwitz for extermination.
The mufti with support from Himmler and Eichmann and via pressure on European governments was involved in the further extermination of 480,000 Jews. (d)

Post WWII the Mufti supported global jihad movements, urging a “full struggle” against the Hindus of India (and Israeli Jews) before delegates at the February 1951 World Muslim Congress: “We shall meet next with sword in hand on the soil of either Kashmir or Palestine.” (d)

Others who witnessed the communist and fascist fervour in Europe (Carl Jung-Swiss psychiatrist, historian Waldermar Gurian) note the warlike and Islamic emotion, and that Hitler was a fanatical simplifier like Mohammad.
 Karl Barth (1886-1968, highly important Swiss theologian strongly against Nazism) warned in 1939 that when Nazism/National Socialism met resistance it would crush and kill and stated:

‘Islam of old as we know proceeded in this way. It is impossible to understand National Socialism unless we see it in fact as a new Islam [emphasis in original], its myth as a new Allah, and Hitler as this new Allah’s Prophet.’(d)
The totalitarianism of Islam like Nazism/state socialism is admitted by Arab Muslims eg Aboul Saud:
“You might describe Mohammedanism as a religious form of State Socialism…The Koran give the State the right to nationalize industry, distribute land, or expropriate the right to nationalize industry, distribute land, or expropriate property. It grants the ruler of the State unlimited powers, so long as he does not go against the Koran. The Koran is our personal as well as our political constitution.”(d)
 
Good Old Days
Today, the neo-Nazi North German Action Office are firm supporters of Islamic jihad (d)

Just as we refuse to acknowledge that terrorists are devout Muslims despite the fact that they quote Islamic text supporting their acts, so we refuse to believe the great similarity between Nazism and its far worse precedent Islam despite the fact that both Nazis and Muslims clearly acknowledge the similarity.  Wilders is to be prosecuted for TELLING THE TRUTH!

Islam likened to other deadly totalitarian ideologies:
20th century western Philosopher Bertrand Russell claimed Buddhism and Christianity were similar (personal, doctrines of love, contemplation) but said Islam was like Bolshevism (unspiritual, win the empire of this world)(1920 Theory and Practice of Bolshevism)(i, j)
Jules Monnerot (1909-1995), Essay writer, Sociologist, French journalist, cofounder of the Collège of sociology (1939) and of the review Critique (1946) who studied Communism, fascism, and religions –particularly Islam,  noted in his Sociology and Psychology of Communism the tyranny of soviet communism and its similarity to Islam:Dreaming the nightmare
‘Communism, like victorious Islam, makes no distinction between politics and religion’. (i,j)
Other victims in Europe:
Across Europe, any who dare to criticise Islam can face charges and descriptions as ‘far right’ (but if Nazism is right then Islam is far right and also far left like totalitarian communism??) and ‘racists’ (but Islam is incredibly racist??) eg Austrian Parliamentarian Susanne Winter convicted JAN 2009 of ‘incitement’ for accurately stating that Mohammad was a paedophile!   She was guilty of ‘humiliating a religion’ and given a fine and suspended prison sentence!!!(g)

Why are we gagging the truth about Islam?  Why are the messengers being shot while the foul message is protected??   
Surely the foul text of Islam, the vile behaviour of Mohammad would ‘humiliate’ any decent religion!!  
Religion’s are ideologies—they don’t have ‘feelings’ and cannot be ‘humiliated.’   But they can and should be analysed and criticised!

When will this insanity STOP

19th century Swiss historian Burckhardt described Mohammad as personally very fanatical and suggests that we shouldn’t regard Mohammad as great for despite its wide following,:
“In this instance it is rather the low qualities of human nature that have received a powerful presentation. Islam is a triumph of triviality, ..…But triviality likes to be tyrannical and is fond of imposing its yoke upon nobler spirits...’
He also noted:
The strongest proof of real, extremely despotic power in Islam is the fact that it has been able to invalidate, in such large measure, the entire history (customs, religion, previous way of looking at things, earlier imagination) of the peoples converted to it. It accomplished this only by instilling into them a new religious arrogance which was stronger than everything and induced them to be ashamed [emphasis in original] of their past. (i)

Aren’t we surrounded by dhimmi academics and politicians who constantly abuse our society and history ...but never criticise the monstrosity of Islam.

Geert Wilders is just a man who no doubt has many faults but in this instance he states the truth about Islam and stands for our freedom, Susanne Winterequality and ‘libertarian’ western society against the ultimate tyranny—Islam and for this he becomes a criminal!

In Australia, particularly Victoria we already live in the nightmare unfolding in Europe as Muslims can lie endlessly about Islam and ‘academics’ never ask hard questions but paint a rosy view, while any who wish to express other views cannot enter the public forum for fear of violence and legal threats thanks to the ‘Religious Vilification Act’ WHERE TRUTH ISN”T A DEFENSE!

We suspect that under the guise of ‘protecting religious freedom’ our federal government will attempt to enforce equally insane legislation Australia wide so that the most evil ideology in the world can enter Australia and call itself a religion but we could say nothing incase we offend one of its followers and ‘vilify’ the religion by telling the TRUTH

Melanie Phillips states:
“This is a defining moment for Europe. It is when people have to decide what side they are on. All those ‘human rights’ supporters who tell us endlessly that we can only defend our society against terror if we remain true to its values now must decide whether they are going to defend Geert Wilders against the attempt to criminalise him for exercising his freedom to speak in defence of life, liberty and western liberalism --  or whether they are going to run up the white flag in the face of Islamist totalitarianism enforced by its already enslaved western dupes.” (a)

It is also important for Australia which is well down the slippery slope to Islamic totalitarianism.   If people can’t tell truth, evil will triumph!

Two of Geert Wilders speeches are a must read eg

1) his speech to the Dutch parliament where he notes the destruction of Dutch society; immigrants who take but don’t accept Dutch values and standards; Islamisation;  increased crime;  an Islamic intifada;  failure by police to protect citizens and the need for military to intervention;  the damage of multiculturalism and  Muslim immigration;  the massive cost of supporting immigrants while Dutch old people lack funds;  the failure of the elite and the growing anger of ordinary people and calls for the expulsion of immigrants who break Dutch laws and protection of a free Holland with rejection of the ideologies being forced onto them (e)

2) his speech in Jerusalem “The Jihad against Israel is the Jihad against the West.”  14/12/08 where he notes Huntington’s quote –all Islam’s borders  (and interiors) are bloody.  “This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, just like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way of the Islamic advance.”  He notes Islamic opposition to art, academic exploration and details the Islamisation/stealth jihad in Holland.  He states our culture IS better than Islam and notes the sellout by goups to suicidal multiculturalism and cultural relativism.  He explains how our tolerance, democracy, religious freedom, welfare state, open borders are used to destroy us.  He notes Islam’s desire for dominance and submission of others -There is no moderate Islam.  He has a moral duty to educate people about Islam.


 Islam is a totalitarian ideology full of hate, violence and submission.

Europe is in the process of Islamisation, and that we need to fight it. Because if we don’t fight the Islamization we will lose everything; our cultural identity, our democracy, our rule of law, our liberties, our freedom. We have the duty to defend the ideas of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem. The ancient heritage of our forefathers is under attack; we have to stand up and defend it.”  (k)


Ditto the entire world!
To send support for Geert Wilders see Geert’s website

 

References (not in alphabetical order)
a)  Melanie Phillips: Adefining Moment 22/1/09
b)  I support democrat Geert “Charlie” Wilders against islamic fascism and its dhimmis.  23/1/09
c)  Amsterdam Court of Appeal orders the criminal prosecution of the Member of Parliament of the Dutch Second Chamber Geert Wilders 21/1/09
d)  Hitler and Jihad: Andrew Bostom 24/10/08 
e)  Diana West 26/9/08 
f)  Geert Wilders in Jerusalem “The Jihad against Israel is the Jihad against the West.”
December 14th, 2008

g)  Austrian far-right legislator convicted of anti-Muslim incitement:  DPA  22/1/09 
h)  Shame on The Netherlands: Pat Condell
i)  Islamofascism? Hitler, Muhammad, and Islam   Andrew Bostom  
j) Islamofascism? Hitler, Muhammad, and Islam   
k)  Geert Wilders in Jerusalem “The Jihad against Israel is the Jihad against the West --Bostom 14/12/08


Support Geert Wilders:
a)  Write or email--
Mr Ernst Hirsch Ballin
Dutch Minister for Justice
Postbus 20301
2500 EH Den Haag
Nederland
email: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

b)  Go to this SITE .. and sign the growing petition in support of Geert Wilders, ....
 
c) Go to Sharia Petition and support the Global Statement Against Sharia Law and the UK One Law For All Campaign and Petition.
 
The website listed under (b) in the references gives more information--
 
d)  One will find the names of the dhimmis guilty of this “legal” Jihad against Geert Wilders in
One can find their public professional postal addresses with a search engine and a little amount of patience, resulting in the following information:

- The dhimmi lawyer who initiated that “legal” Jihad is Gerard Spong.
The web site of his office is HERE
Its postal address is on THIS page.

The names of the associates of this lawyer are on THIS page

e)  It is the Amsterdam district which rules the case (court of appeal and public prosecutor’s department)
The address of the court of appeal is on THIS page
Beware, you must write to the “postbus” (P.O. box) address.
Correspondentie-adres

Postbus 1312
1000 BH Amsterdam
Telefoonnummer (020) 541 21 11
E-mail
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

The names of the three judges are on THIS   page , on second sentence of paragraph “The Judges, by Theodor Holman”.

The 3 Judges: Mr. Tom Schalken, Mr. J.P Splint, and Mr F.A. Hartsuiker.

f- Regarding the public prosecutor’s department, -spokesperson, Otto van der Bijl, and all the names of the main people for the public prosecutor’s department of Amsterdam HERE : (click on “Arrondissementsparket Amsterdam”)
Persofficieren van Justitie
Dhr.mr. O.J.M (Otto) van der Bijl
Mw. mr. H.A.B. (Hanneke) Festen
Mw. mr. A. (Alexandra) Oswald  

Functional Public Prosecutor's Office
Enthovenplein 1
PO Box 19518
NL-2500 CM The Hague
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 3200
Fax: +31 (0)70 302 3222
E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

All-purpose address (”Algemeen”) P.O. Box (”postbus”) for public prosecutor’s department of Amsterdam is on THIS page   --see below
Contact  
Algemeen adres
Parnassusweg 220
Postbus 84500
1080 BN Amsterdam
Tel. 020 541 2111
Hoofdofficier van Justitie
mr. H.J. Bolhaar
Plaatsvervangend hoofdofficier van Justitie
mr. F.W.M. van Straelen
Persvoorlichting
Tel: 020 541 2301
buiten kantooruren: 06 - 53735315
Fax: 020 541 3768
Publieksvoorlichting
Tel: 020 541 2300
Fax: 020 541 3768
E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it


You can register to the newsletter alertes-sita.blogspot.com
Last Updated on Monday, 09 February 2009 04:40  

AIM Listed by NLA

pandora

Australian Islamist Monitor's web publications were selected for preservation by the National Library of Australia. Access to our materials stored in the NLA Archive is facilitated in two ways: via the Library’s online catalogue; and via subject and title lists maintained on the PANDORA home page.
Click HERE for direct access to the archive

Islam Kills

History - Articles

Lest We Forget the Battle of Tours

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Australians celebrate and revere Anzac Day on April 25th each year in remembrance of our brave soldiers who fought in two great world wars to secure our freedom. Every Australian identifies with the slogan “lest we forget” and in services held around the country people reflect on the battles and men who died to secure our freedom. Yet across the world in France, there is one remarkable battle which helped form the Europe we know today and allowed the development of civilization based on Judeo Christian principles. This one famous battle has become known as the battle of Tours and effectively stopped the Muslim advance into Europe. After the death of Mohammed in 632AD, Muslim armies exploded out of the Arabian peninsula to conquer much of the Middle East, expanding across north Africa. From there they crossed into Spain in 711AD and eventually controlled much of al-Andalus by 715AD. It was the victory at Tours by Charles Martel that stemmed the tide and eventually the Muslim marauders were expelled from Spain in 1492 when the last outpost at Granada fell to King Ferdinand of Spain. 

Read more

Shivaji’s Coronation Laudatory Landmark

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Infidels' Resistance

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was born, lived, fought and won battles against religious and social oppression in the 17th century Bharat or India. He was a shining star in the Indian firmament and is renowned as a champion of the downtrodden and depressed masses. He was and continues to be an icon for the classes and masses alike and is seen as a rallying point for peasants oppressed by foreign rulers, Pathans and Moghuls alike. Sexually exploited women found in Shivaji Raje a protector, a benefactor and flocked to his Hindavi Swaraj to find solace and feel liberated under his saffron flag. 

Read more


Ransomer of Captives from the Muslims

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Perhaps some readers might be interested to know that January 28 is considered a feast day among Catholics – actually 2 feast days are celebrated on the same day – one is of ST Thomas Aquinas, the great medieval theologian and philosopher who adapted Aristotle to the western Judeo-Christian worldview. . It is also the feast day of a lesser known person – St Peter Nolasco, the great ransomer of captives from the Muslims.

Read more


Islamic Pirates

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Barbary Corsair
Somalian Islamic Pirates & Lessons from History
 
The dramatic rescue of the American cargo-ship captain Richard Phillips from the hands of Somalian Islamic pirates by the U.S. Navy—killing three pirates, holding him hostage at gun-point, through precision-targeting—warrants a review of the U.S. struggle with piracy and hostage-taking in North Africa, which ended two centuries ago.

Raiding trade-caravans and hostage-taking for extracting ransom in Islam was started by Prophet Muhammad. Having become powerful and secure after his relocation to Medina from Mecca in 622, Muhammad initiated Jihad or holy war in the form of raids of trade-caravans for earning livelihood for his community. In the first successful raid of a Meccan caravan at Nakhla in December 623, his brigands killed one of the attendants, took two of them captive, and acquired the caravan as “sacred” booty. The captives were ransomed to generate further revenue. Muhammad, later on, expanded this mode of Jihad to raiding non-Muslim communities around Arabia—for capturing their homes, properties and livestock, capturing their women and children as slaves often for ransoming and selling, and imposing extortional taxes—which sometimes involved mass-slaughter of the attacked victims.

Read more


The Battle of Broken Hill

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

Battle of Broken Hill Logo
 
The First Islamic Terrorist Attack on Australian Soil
 
On January 1, 1915 two Broken Hill men, both former camel drivers, armed themselves with rifles, an homemade flag bearing Islamic insignia and a large supply of ammunition and launched a surprise attack on the Picnic Train about 3 kilometres outside Broken Hill.

The train carried about 1200 Broken Hill residents to Silverton where a picnic to celebrate the new year was to take place.

The two Muslim men, Gool Mohamed originally a Pashtun tribesman from Afghanistan and Mullah Abdullah from what is known today as Pakistan, decided to wage jihad against Australian infidels after Australia and the Ottoman Empire officially joined the opposite sides in the WWI.

Read more


Jihad Galore

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Jihad Galore and the Toledo Whore

Battle of Higueruela

Alhambra - GazelleHow often in conversation with a Muslim, do they quote Spain as the crowning achievement of Islam, where Muslims, Jews and Christians lived in harmony for about 800 years?

And when you mention the killings and massacres, you are told that the Spanish Inquisition was much worse.
This is a misconception, since the Inquisition in Spain was responsible for only between 4,000 and 5,000 lives. [1]

Yet in 1066AD, in a single day, muslims murdered over 4,000 Jews because Vizier Joseph ibn Naghrela had risen to a position greater than them, and of course, this upset the Muslim sensitivities. [2]

Read more


Arabs Hated The Quran

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

 
How the Arabs Hated The Quran
 
Old Quran

Wh y are you a Muslim?
Musli ms in general love to hear the above question because it has a simple and readymade answer in their minds besides it gives them the opp or t u nity to propagate their religion and talk proudly about Islam.

 

Read more


Lepanto Anniversary

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Decisive Victory for the West

At this time of year, it is timely to remember one of the greatest victories of the west against the Islamic world. On the 7th October in 1571, Don Juan and the Holy League, led by Admiral Doria, defeated the larger Ottoman fleet in the Battle of Lepanto, saving Europe from the Turks and militant Islam. The Holy League was a coalition of different armies - of the Republic of Venice, the Papacy (under Pope Pius V), Spain (including Naples, Sicily and Sardinia), the Republic of Genoa, the Duchy of Savoy, the Knights Hospitaller and some others.

Read more


Muslim Jerusalem

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

Jerusalem - Coat of ArmsWhy do Muslims insist that Jerusalem is their Holy City?
When Mohamed and his faithful followers moved from Mecca to Medina, they found themselves among three Jewish tribes/clans (BANU-L-NADIR, BANU KAINUKA and BANU KURAIZA)  which settled there some time after their expulsion from their homeland and also living there were  two Arab, pagan tribes.

Mohammed, who at this stage needed more followers, decided to win those tribes over and convert them to his newly invented religion.

Islam was yet not as fully developed as we know it today, and Mohammed was still having his sessions with Allah (the Medina period revelations).

Read more


Killing of Banu Quraiza

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Did Prophet Muhammad order Killing Surrendered Jews of Banu Quraiza and Khaybar?  A historical Analysis

In the post 9/11 era of this modern-world, Islamists around the globe are busy with ‘damage control utopia’ in order to correct the image of religion Islam. We all know that the nucleus of Islam are: Quran, Hadiths (Sunnah) supported by Islamic histories and biographies recorded by various famous Islamic scholars and historians.

What Mecca?

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Early History

A great tragedy of the Islamic control of our universities and political correctness plus the fear of extreme violence if anyone dares question the roots and claims of Islam is ...that nobody dares question the roots and claims of Islam!!!  I want to stimulate interest and offer this summary of information on Mecca from (LINK) which discusses some problems with Muslim claims in a comparison of evidence supporting Islam/Christianity. 

Read more


Yahweh or Hubal

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

FlagThere is a very strongly entrenched view among majority of Westerners today that the three main monotheistic religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam share one common God and therefore despite the obvious differences, the core foundation of these three religions is the same. 

Read more