Australian Islamist Monitor

Islam Under Scrutiny

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Letter from Londonistan 2:

E-mail Print PDF
Who will protect Christianity?

Muzzie Paddington BearLondon’s streets are full of Muslims and the Islamic presence is everywhere. In some areas, such as Paddington/Edgware Road, it is a common sight to see Muslim women with niqabs, and even in areas which are not specifically Islamic, hijabbed women are everwhere.

So does it matter? After all, we live in a pluralistic society and are free to believe whatever we like and dress in whatever way we feel comfortable. Trouble is, Islam doesn’t see it that way, as Islam opposes pluralism and insists we conform to their way of life. When they have the numbers (and boy, they’re working on it!), they will crank up the pressure to impose monocultural Islam, with force if necessary, and take away all our freedoms. If as a woman you value your freedoms, and  don’t want to wear a mask and a tent every time you have to go to Sainsburys to buy some milk, then you’d better start standing up for freedom and not taking it for granted. Same with men: Islam will enslave them, only in different ways.
 
How are Brits reacting to this threat? Well, the leaders are blithely assisting the process of Islamification, but judging from my conversations with ordinary people, most are resentful of Muslims’ incessant demands, and especially resentful that political correctness renders them powerless to express an opinion.
 

Bearing in mind that England is still officially a Christian country, whose Monarch is Head of the Church of England, you’d think if any religion enjoyed a privileged position, it would be Christianity. But you’d think wrong, as our Christian leaders are bending over backwards to endorse Islam, and our heir to the throne, Prince Charles, is a noted Islamophile.

For instance, in the wake of the 9/11 atrocities, he visited the Suleymaniye mosque in East London to show support for British Muslims. Speaking at the mosque, Prince Charles said:
"I very much wanted to come here ... to show how much I minded about and care about the Islamic community in this country, particularly at a time when it's so difficult for everybody.” He also met Muslim leaders at St James’s Palace, where he praised Islam and criticised America, saying "I find the language and rhetoric coming from America too confrontational."  Khalid Mahmood, the Labour MP for Birmingham Perry Bar explained "His criticism of America was a general one of the Americans not having the appreciation we have for Islam and its culture."  (source)
Lesson on Islam
It's been reported Prince Charles is taking extensive Islamic instructions:
Arrrr, nah. Allah is the one riding the other, darker cloud. 

In 2005, while visiting the White House, Prince Charles tried to persuade President Bush it was not Islam's fault that thousands of non-Muslims have been murdered in recent years, but rather the racism of the West, especially its intolerance of Islam in the wake of September 11th.

Back in 1994, he announced that when he became Supreme Governor of the Church of England, he would rather be "defender of faiths" than "defender of the faith". A year earlier Prince Charles made a speech, acclaimed throughout the Arab world, on relations between Islam and the West, urging the West to overcome its "unthinkable prejudices" about Islam and its customs and laws. He spoke of the West's debt to the culture of Islam and distanced moderate Muslims from misguided militants. "Extremism is no more the monopoly of Islam than it is the monopoly of other religions, including Christianity," he said. (as reported in Telegraph UK & Jihad Watch)Feeble Minded Prince

Well Charles, it might be non-PC, but Islam does have the monopoly on extremism, as evidenced by the number of atrocities carried out by Islamic terrorists.


In 2006, on tour in Egypt, Charles called for greater tolerance between the Islamic and Western worlds. In a speech at Al-Azhar university in Cairo, he has also had a go at those who published the Danish cartoons, expressing concern over the 'failure to listen and to respect what is precious and sacred to others.' (reference)

Prince Charles concern about  'failure to listen and to respect what is precious and sacred to others' is admirable, so maybe he’d like to extend it to some Catholics,  who have recently been demonstrating outside the premiere of the play “Fat Christ” at the King’s Head Theatre in Islington . (The Islington Tribune 29th February) The play, described by its producers as an “irreverent comedy”, is about an overweight man who earns money by posing crucified for art galleries. Protesters thronged the entrance of the pub theatre, reciting prayers and waving placards which read “God is not mocked” and “Yet another attack on Christ our saviour.”Protester John McAuley said:
“Catholics are a persecuted minority in this country. Our religion is mocked and all we hold dear is trashed. The whole idea of this play is highly offensive to Catholics, even the poster.”
No offenceProtesters are especially incensed by the timing of the play, falling as it does in the middle of Lent. One bright spot is that Underground bosses have banned a poster of a portly man in pink boxer shorts on a cross advertising the play, on the grounds that it was “likely to offend ethnic, religious or other major groups”. However, the ban was criticised by the Rev Stephen Coles of St Thomas’s Church in Finsbury Park, who said:
“the itch to censor is something one should resist. I can’t quite see how this would cause offence. We’re grown-ups and Jesus can defend himself. One has to be a little wary of indulging the super-sensitive.” (source)
I’m fine with Rev Coles’ comments so long as he would uphold his principles by publishing the Danish cartoons in his Church magazine! After all, as he says “one has to be a little wary of indulging the super-sensitive.
 
”So who else is left to defend Christianity? I guess that role falls to the Head of the Church of England, but as Rowan Williams has ably illustrated, he’s abdicated that responsibility by throwing in his lot with the Muslims and supporting  sharia.
 
But this isn’t the first time for Mufti Rowan. In 2006, he waded into the debate over the Muslim veil, warning politicians not to interfere with people's right to wear visible symbols of their faith.The comments came amid controversy sparked by Jack Straw, a former British foreign secretary, who said that the full-face Muslim veil, or niqab, was a barrier to communication.Since then, a Muslim teaching assistant lost a case against her suspension for refusing to remove her niqab in class and a Christian check-in worker for British Airways was told she could not wear a crucifix at work."The ideal of a society where no visible public signs of religion would be seen -- no crosses round necks, no sidelocks, turbans or veils -- is a politically dangerous one," Dr. Williams wrote. (reference)
 
Oppression of Muslims
Evident oppression of Muslim ladies

 
Sadly, the befuddled Rowan can see no difference between the wearing of a crucifix, a purely religious symbol, and the wearing of the hijab, a political statement by Islamists.
 
This year, he called for new law to protect religious sensibilities that would punish “thoughtless and cruel” styles of speaking.  He said the current blasphemy law was “unworkable”, but whatever replaces it should “send a signal” about what was acceptable . “The legal provision should keep before our eyes the general risks of debasing public controversy by thoughtless and, even if unintentionally, cruel styles of speaking and acting,” he said.
 
In 2006, Parliament passed the Racial and Religious Hatred Act, which creates an offence of inciting or “stirring up” hatred against a person on the grounds of their religion. Dr Williams said:
“As we think about the adequacy of what is coming to replace the blasphemy laws, we should not, I believe, miss the opportunity of asking the larger questions about what is just and good for individuals and groups in our society who hold religious beliefs.”
Mr Sanderson, a secularist, said that the Archbishop appeared in his speech to be making excuses for those whoMufti Rowan rioted about the Salman Rushdie case and threatened the author with death, and also seemed to think that those who created lethal street protests over the Danish cartoons had a point (reference).
 
But surely not all Church leaders are like Rowan? Well, the Guildford diocese, one of the wealthiest in the UK, is giving an unprecedented £250,000 towards a multifaith building at the University of Surrey, in which the largest amount of worship space will be reserved for Muslims. The £6.5 million building will contain separate worship spaces for the Jewish, Christian, Muslim and Sikh communities, along with a further shared space for Buddhists and Hindus. All faiths will share the café in the basement, with a shared staircase down from the upper floors. Converting each other will be forbidden, an insider said, but it is hoped that the different faith members will form friendships, learn to respect each other and enhance each other’s understanding.
 
Yes, one can hope, but given that Islam tells its followers not to be friends with Jews and Christians, and that all non-Muslims must convert to the one true faith or be killed, it must be a rather forlorn hope!
 
Lesley Scordellis, lead fundraiser for the centre and development manager at the University of Surrey, defended the Muslim advantage in the space allocation. “It isn’t about giving greater provision for Muslims, it is about likely numbers using it. We certainly have a strong demand for worship space from the Muslim community,” she said. Mark Rudall, a diocesan spokesman, said: “This building has been identified as a potentially highly significant mission resource in what is seen as an unusually diverse setting.”
 
No prizes for guessing which religion will benefit most from the missionising possibilities! (reference)
 
So is there any hope for Christianity in the UK? Not according to a UN report, which claims the 2001 census findings that nearly 72 per cent of the population is Christian can no longer be regarded as accurate, as two thirds of British people do not admit to any religious affiliation.
 
It calls for the disestablishment of the Church of England, as the role and privileges of the Church do not reflect “the religious demography of the country and the rising proportion of other Mark RudallChristian denominations”.The report says that there is an “overall respect for human rights and their value” but it gives warning of discrimination against Muslims.
 
Citing research that 80 per cent of Muslims in Britain feel that they have been discriminated against, the report singles out the Terrorism Act 2000 for particular criticism. Under the Act police in some areas can stop and search people without having to show reasonable suspicion.
 
The report says that this affects ethnic and religious minorities more than other groups, especially since the bombings of July 7, 2005. Figures for 2004 to 2006 “show that searches of people with Asian appearance under this provision increased by 84 per cent, compared to an increase of only 24 per cent for white people”. (reference)
 
Funny, I hadn’t noticed the Church had any role in post-modern Britain, nor that it had any privileges, unless you count it a privilege to be relentlessly mocked.
 
So my suggestion to the Catholic protesters: get in touch with the Head of the Church of England, who professes concern at 'failure to listen and to respect what is precious and sacred to others'. Get in touch also with Rowan Williams, who wishes to protect religious sensibilities and punish “thoughtless and cruel” styles of speaking.
 
Sadly, I doubt whether Muftis Charles and Rowan would be particularly concerned about mocking Christianity.Now if you were Muslims, of course that would be quite different. Islam must not be mocked; could it have anything to do with the fact its adherents can turn very ugly when you offend their religion!
Last Updated on Tuesday, 05 August 2008 06:27  

AIM Listed by NLA

pandora

Australian Islamist Monitor's web publications were selected for preservation by the National Library of Australia. Access to our materials stored in the NLA Archive is facilitated in two ways: via the Library’s online catalogue; and via subject and title lists maintained on the PANDORA home page.
Click HERE for direct access to the archive

Islam Kills

History - Articles

Lest We Forget the Battle of Tours

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Australians celebrate and revere Anzac Day on April 25th each year in remembrance of our brave soldiers who fought in two great world wars to secure our freedom. Every Australian identifies with the slogan “lest we forget” and in services held around the country people reflect on the battles and men who died to secure our freedom. Yet across the world in France, there is one remarkable battle which helped form the Europe we know today and allowed the development of civilization based on Judeo Christian principles. This one famous battle has become known as the battle of Tours and effectively stopped the Muslim advance into Europe. After the death of Mohammed in 632AD, Muslim armies exploded out of the Arabian peninsula to conquer much of the Middle East, expanding across north Africa. From there they crossed into Spain in 711AD and eventually controlled much of al-Andalus by 715AD. It was the victory at Tours by Charles Martel that stemmed the tide and eventually the Muslim marauders were expelled from Spain in 1492 when the last outpost at Granada fell to King Ferdinand of Spain. 

Read more

Shivaji’s Coronation Laudatory Landmark

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Infidels' Resistance

Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj was born, lived, fought and won battles against religious and social oppression in the 17th century Bharat or India. He was a shining star in the Indian firmament and is renowned as a champion of the downtrodden and depressed masses. He was and continues to be an icon for the classes and masses alike and is seen as a rallying point for peasants oppressed by foreign rulers, Pathans and Moghuls alike. Sexually exploited women found in Shivaji Raje a protector, a benefactor and flocked to his Hindavi Swaraj to find solace and feel liberated under his saffron flag. 

Read more


Ransomer of Captives from the Muslims

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Perhaps some readers might be interested to know that January 28 is considered a feast day among Catholics – actually 2 feast days are celebrated on the same day – one is of ST Thomas Aquinas, the great medieval theologian and philosopher who adapted Aristotle to the western Judeo-Christian worldview. . It is also the feast day of a lesser known person – St Peter Nolasco, the great ransomer of captives from the Muslims.

Read more


Islamic Pirates

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Violent Jihad

Barbary Corsair
Somalian Islamic Pirates & Lessons from History
 
The dramatic rescue of the American cargo-ship captain Richard Phillips from the hands of Somalian Islamic pirates by the U.S. Navy—killing three pirates, holding him hostage at gun-point, through precision-targeting—warrants a review of the U.S. struggle with piracy and hostage-taking in North Africa, which ended two centuries ago.

Raiding trade-caravans and hostage-taking for extracting ransom in Islam was started by Prophet Muhammad. Having become powerful and secure after his relocation to Medina from Mecca in 622, Muhammad initiated Jihad or holy war in the form of raids of trade-caravans for earning livelihood for his community. In the first successful raid of a Meccan caravan at Nakhla in December 623, his brigands killed one of the attendants, took two of them captive, and acquired the caravan as “sacred” booty. The captives were ransomed to generate further revenue. Muhammad, later on, expanded this mode of Jihad to raiding non-Muslim communities around Arabia—for capturing their homes, properties and livestock, capturing their women and children as slaves often for ransoming and selling, and imposing extortional taxes—which sometimes involved mass-slaughter of the attacked victims.

Read more


The Battle of Broken Hill

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

Battle of Broken Hill Logo
 
The First Islamic Terrorist Attack on Australian Soil
 
On January 1, 1915 two Broken Hill men, both former camel drivers, armed themselves with rifles, an homemade flag bearing Islamic insignia and a large supply of ammunition and launched a surprise attack on the Picnic Train about 3 kilometres outside Broken Hill.

The train carried about 1200 Broken Hill residents to Silverton where a picnic to celebrate the new year was to take place.

The two Muslim men, Gool Mohamed originally a Pashtun tribesman from Afghanistan and Mullah Abdullah from what is known today as Pakistan, decided to wage jihad against Australian infidels after Australia and the Ottoman Empire officially joined the opposite sides in the WWI.

Read more


Jihad Galore

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Tolerance Myths

Jihad Galore and the Toledo Whore

Battle of Higueruela

Alhambra - GazelleHow often in conversation with a Muslim, do they quote Spain as the crowning achievement of Islam, where Muslims, Jews and Christians lived in harmony for about 800 years?

And when you mention the killings and massacres, you are told that the Spanish Inquisition was much worse.
This is a misconception, since the Inquisition in Spain was responsible for only between 4,000 and 5,000 lives. [1]

Yet in 1066AD, in a single day, muslims murdered over 4,000 Jews because Vizier Joseph ibn Naghrela had risen to a position greater than them, and of course, this upset the Muslim sensitivities. [2]

Read more


Arabs Hated The Quran

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

 
How the Arabs Hated The Quran
 
Old Quran

Wh y are you a Muslim?
Musli ms in general love to hear the above question because it has a simple and readymade answer in their minds besides it gives them the opp or t u nity to propagate their religion and talk proudly about Islam.

 

Read more


Lepanto Anniversary

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Decisive Victory for the West

At this time of year, it is timely to remember one of the greatest victories of the west against the Islamic world. On the 7th October in 1571, Don Juan and the Holy League, led by Admiral Doria, defeated the larger Ottoman fleet in the Battle of Lepanto, saving Europe from the Turks and militant Islam. The Holy League was a coalition of different armies - of the Republic of Venice, the Papacy (under Pope Pius V), Spain (including Naples, Sicily and Sardinia), the Republic of Genoa, the Duchy of Savoy, the Knights Hospitaller and some others.

Read more


Muslim Jerusalem

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Stolen Heritage

Jerusalem - Coat of ArmsWhy do Muslims insist that Jerusalem is their Holy City?
When Mohamed and his faithful followers moved from Mecca to Medina, they found themselves among three Jewish tribes/clans (BANU-L-NADIR, BANU KAINUKA and BANU KURAIZA)  which settled there some time after their expulsion from their homeland and also living there were  two Arab, pagan tribes.

Mohammed, who at this stage needed more followers, decided to win those tribes over and convert them to his newly invented religion.

Islam was yet not as fully developed as we know it today, and Mohammed was still having his sessions with Allah (the Medina period revelations).

Read more


Killing of Banu Quraiza

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Imperialism

Did Prophet Muhammad order Killing Surrendered Jews of Banu Quraiza and Khaybar?  A historical Analysis

In the post 9/11 era of this modern-world, Islamists around the globe are busy with ‘damage control utopia’ in order to correct the image of religion Islam. We all know that the nucleus of Islam are: Quran, Hadiths (Sunnah) supported by Islamic histories and biographies recorded by various famous Islamic scholars and historians.

What Mecca?

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

History - Early History

A great tragedy of the Islamic control of our universities and political correctness plus the fear of extreme violence if anyone dares question the roots and claims of Islam is ...that nobody dares question the roots and claims of Islam!!!  I want to stimulate interest and offer this summary of information on Mecca from (LINK) which discusses some problems with Muslim claims in a comparison of evidence supporting Islam/Christianity. 

Read more


Yahweh or Hubal

Attention: open in a new window. PDF | Print | E-mail

FlagThere is a very strongly entrenched view among majority of Westerners today that the three main monotheistic religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam share one common God and therefore despite the obvious differences, the core foundation of these three religions is the same. 

Read more