Australian Islamist Monitor

An old joke, but now a debating issue.

 This was on old joke that at first glance appears to be cruel. However, with the debate on burquas in Europe taking off in earnest, people are facing up to what seems so self evident. The photo is indeed shocking. No surprise then that last year the French President Nicolas Sarkozy came out and said what most people think; that burquas are incompatible with equal rights for women. 

Age journalist, Geoff Strong, took a dim view of Aussies. In 2005, he berated us for our racism:

Now that the London bombings have resurrected religious suspicion to its time-honoured place in the Australian mindset, then turned the blowtorch of blame on to multiculturalism, it is worth considering the experience of Shepparton.

Listen to the outpourings from the hand-wringers and the recipe for inter-culture conflagration is simple: take an established, somewhat conservative community, pour in a large number of outsiders that look, act and think differently and whammo - distrust leading to conflict. 

Islam is a totalitarian political doctrine wrapped in religious garb. Oppression of Muslims and Non-Muslims is Islam’s calling card. Islamic Sharia Law condemns freedom of speech, religion, conscience and action; it forbids equality between men and women and between Muslims and non-Muslims. The essence of Islamic Sharia Law is the denial of human rights; therefore it is legitimate that we reject it.

Islamic Sharia Law is irreconcilably in conflict with the US Constitution. Every City, County, State and Congress should state:
“We shall ensure that Islamic Sharia Law is not allowed, enacted nor tolerated in our jurisdiction.”

No matter the temperament of individual Muslims, the Islamic community as a whole, the “ummah,” drives the process of Islamization (codification of Islamic supremacy via Sharia law) in every country where Islam thrives. There is no room to list the thousands of violent acts of Muslims against non-Muslims in the name of Islam. Across the globe violence and political upheaval are associated with increasing Muslim populations.

But ... it's not really about the son.

Dr Nasrul Ameer Ali, son of a prominent Australian Islamist Dr Ameer Ali, was fired from his academic position at Murdoch University for trying to get sexual favours from his female students in exchange for higher or simply "pass" marks.

MURDOCH University yesterday sacked an academic it hired last year.
At the time of hiring, the university had been oblivious to the fact that he was under investigation as a sexual predator of students at another Perth university. (source) 

Preferably  the traditional Muslim way - beheading.

This would make George Negus,  an enthusiastic supporter of Islamisation of Australia, PROUD!

Tim Bush, the religion teacher of Ivanhoe Grammar, to which school Eeqbaal Hassim was given a scholarship when he came to Australia, has taken up the "Learning From One Another" agenda and is running with it.

The Heidelberg Leader last week reported - no doubt at Mr Bush's request - that he had organised a "Teaching Islam Today" conference which thirty-five teachers attended. The article claimed that, "There is growing interest among educators looking for new ways to engage [sic] religion in the classroom." 

Reading Patrick Sookhdeo’s book “Faith, Power and Territory, A Handbook of British Islam”, I was fascinated by his explanation of the Doctrine of Sacred Space.

P45 “Islam is a territorial religion, very conscious of whether or not an area is under Islamic control."

Areas not under such control are termed Dar al-Harb (the House of War), which reflects the classical Islamic teaching that such territory must be subjugated by Muslim military might. Any space once gained is considered sacred and belongs to the umma for ever. Non-Muslims could at best be tenants on their former property. Any lost sacred space must be regained – by force if necessary. 

So far we have collected about two thousand signatures but, as we had set our target at three thousand, we need some extra time before sending them to the House of Representatives. Accordingly, we have a new closing date, the end of October, which should allow sufficient time for all petition forms to be returned.

Unfortunately, we fear, some of your valuable signatures might not be recognized by the Committee on Petitions.

We prepared the form (available for downloading HERE) in accordance with the instructions set by the Standing Committee on Petitions and so there is no need to change or to add columns into the signatures table.

Please note: some forms were filled out with signatures on the reverse (probably due to there not being enough forms distributed) but these will not be recognised.

Ours is a social, political and legal system that makes much of “precedence”. It has been common practice in Australian civic life for events in Europe, in particular, and the world in general, to shape our political discourse, to be the cause of changes to existing law and even the basis of new law. Much of our “Human Rights” law has been delivered to us because of European precedence; the United Nations interferes in Australian law on the same pretext, there’s precedence in some other arena that is deemed applicable to Australia and so, we comply. How else to explain "Political Correctness"? No Australian could have dreamed it up, it has to be imported.

Pakistan has mastered the dubious art of running with the hare and hunting with the hound simultaneously. This is precisely what Pakistan has been doing all along in Afghanistan. Pakistan begged for US aid, received it for promised services to fight against radical Islamist groups in Afghanistan but encouraged Al Qaida supported Taliban to mount attacks on the US soldiers and kill them. Pakistan professed friendship with India and showed keenness for composite dialogue with India but its ISI officers paid hard currency cash to LeT to kill Indian officers, contractors and other road building personnel in Afghanistan. This was outright an act of cheating the Americans and damaging the Indian interests in Kabul to enable its forces to rule the roost there. 

Ramadan always brings out the best in Muslims. It's a time for murder, slaughter, looting, pillage and rape in the name of fighting the fitna.

Quran-2:217 They question thee (O Muhammad) with regard to warfare in the sacred month. (RAMADAN) Say: Warfare therein is a great (transgression), but to turn (men) from the way of Allah, and to disbelieve in Him and in the Inviolable Place of Worship, and to expel His people thence, is a greater with Allah; for FITNA is worse than slaughter.

For a good Muslim Fitna means mortal insult against Islam, and who can judge better what a mortal insult against Islam is than a good Muslim? 

Tariq Ramadan made the false claim that Mohammad never hit a woman (King 2010)–ignoring the fact that he hit child bride Aisha hard in the chest.  Tariq also ignores the other acts of ‘domestic’ violence practised and endorsed by Mohammad eg Paedophilia, clitoridectomy, ploughing women like fields and more (see part 1).  Mohammad’s view of women as inferior, devils and under the control of men set the scene for domestic violence and violence in general.  Mohammad participated in a wide array of acts of violence against girls/women in general whether he committed the violence himself, ordered others to carry it out or praised it later, it was clear that Mohammad supported violence against women and this violence and repressive control is encoded in Islam’s text and laws forever.

It will be a mortal mistake for America to allow this Mosque to be built so close to the Ground Zero. Like it or not, this Mosque will be the iconic symbol of Islamic victory flag hoisted over the WTC rubbles—meaning humiliating defeat of infidel America by the Islamic jihadis. Mosque will stand as the most provocative insult and a painful slap on the face of America.

Islam in real sense is the religion of great deception. Imam Feisal and his Islamic gang (ASMA) are lying big-time. Western folks having monumental confusion to understand the real purpose of this Mosque and also unable to fathom (because of lack of knowledge in Islamic history) why exactly Muslims are planning to erect just a few yards from the 9/11 site—a Grand Mosque, they call it “Cordoba Hose”.

Integration for Muslims very problematic, says Danish psychologist

A young Danish psychologist, Nicolai Sennels, made news last year in Denmark after publishing a book entitled Among criminal Muslims. A psychologist’s experience from Copenhagen. He has worked for several years directly with young criminal Muslims in Copenhagen and has come to the conclusion that there are four myths concerning the successful integration of Muslim minorities.

At a conference on integration in Copenhagen, he provoked a legal injunction that nearly got him sacked for suggesting that present failed policies were misdirected. He claimed that Islamic culture plays a significant role concerning integration, crime and religious extremism. He emphasized that people from a Muslim culture “find it difficult, if not impossible, to create a successful life in Denmark.” In an interview in EuropeNews he says: 

Many readers will be aware of the brave ex-Muslim Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali who held the position of Anglican Bishop of Rochester in the UK for almost 15 years. He was outspoken against the dangers of Islam and received many death threats directed not only at himself but also his family by the brave UK Muslims. Sadly Bishop Nazir-Ali resigned when Rowan Williams assumed the position of Arch Bishop of Canterbury and took the Anglican church into Dhimmitude by approving of Sharia Law in England.